A man of this sort is a curious mental phenomenon. He appears to get
early—perhaps to be born with, a kind of dry schedule or catalogue of the
universe; he has a ledger in his head, and has a title to which he can
refer any transaction; nothing puzzles him, nothing comes amiss to him,
but he is not in the least the wiser for anything. Like the book-keeper,
he has his heads of account, and he knows them, but he is no wiser for
the particular items. After a busy day, and after a slow day, after a
few entries, and after many, his knowledge is exactly the same: take his
opinion of Baron Rothschild, he will say, ‘Yes, he keeps an account with
us;’ of Humphrey Brown, ‘Yes, we have that account, too.’ Just so with
the class of minds which we are speaking of, and in greater matters. Very
early in life they come to a certain and considerable acquaintance with
the world; they learn very quickly all they can learn, and naturally
they never, in any way, learn any more. Mr. Pitt is, in this country,
the type of the character. Mr. Alison, in a well-known passage, makes it
a matter of wonder that he was fit to be a Chancellor of the Exchequer
at twenty-three, and it _is_ a great wonder. But it is to be remembered
that he was no more fit at forty-three. As somebody said, he did not
grow, he was cast. Experience taught him nothing, and he did not believe
that he had anything to learn. The habit of mind in smaller degrees is
not very rare, and might be illustrated without end. Hazlitt tells a
story of West, the painter, that is in point: When some one asked him if
he had ever been to Greece, he answered, ‘No, I have read a descriptive
catalogue of the principal objects in that country, and I believe I am as
well conversant with them as if I had visited it.’ No doubt he was just
as well conversant, and so would be any _doctrinaire_.
But Shakespeare was not a man of this sort. If he walked down a street,
he knew what was in that street. His mind did not form in early life
a classified list of all the objects in the universe, and learn no
more about the universe ever after. From a certain fine sensibility of
nature, it is plain that he took a keen interest not only in the general
and coarse outlines of objects, but in their minutest particulars and
gentlest gradations. You may open Shakespeare and find the clearest
proofs of this; take the following:—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account