the old gentleman thought the young gentleman by no means a working
man, and objected—believing that a small income can only be made more
by unremitting industry,—and the young gentleman admitting this horrid
and abstract fact, and agreeing, though perhaps tacitly, in his uncle’s
estimate of his personal predilections, did not object to being objected
to. The nature of Cowper was not, indeed, passionate. He required beyond
almost any man the daily society of amiable and cultivated women. It
is clear that he preferred such gentle excitement to the rough and
argumentative pleasures of more masculine companionship. His easy and
humorous nature loved and learned from female detail. But he had no
overwhelming partiality for a particular individual. One refined lady,
the first moments of shyness over, was nearly as pleasing as another
refined lady. Disappointment sits easy on such a mind. Perhaps, too,
he feared the anxious duties, the rather contentious tenderness of
matrimonial existence. At any rate, he acquiesced. Theodora never
married. Love did not, however, kill her—at least, if it did, it was
a long time at the task, as she survived these events more than sixty
years. She never, seemingly, forgot the past.
But a dark cloud was at hand. If there be any truly painful fact about
the world now tolerably well established by ample experience and ample
records, it is that an intellectual and indolent happiness is wholly
denied to the children of men. That most valuable author, Lucretius, who
has supplied us and others with an inexhaustible supply of metaphors on
this topic, ever dwells on the life of his gods with a sad and melancholy
feeling that no such life was possible on a crude and cumbersome earth.
In general, the two opposing agencies are marriage and money; either
of these breaks the lot of literary and refined inaction at once and
for ever. The first of these, as we have seen, Cowper had escaped. His
reserved and negligent reveries were still free, at least from the
invasion of affection. To this invasion, indeed, there is commonly
requisite the acquiescence or connivance of mortality; but all men are
born, not free and equal, as the Americans maintain, but, in the old
world at least, basely subjected to the yoke of coin. It is in vain that
in this hemisphere we endeavour after impecuniary fancies. In bold and
eager youth we go out on our travels. We visit Baalbec, and Paphos, and
Tadmor, and Cythera,—ancient shrines and ancient empires, seats of eager
love or gentle inspiration. We wander far and long. We have nothing to
do with our fellow-men. What are we, indeed, to diggers and counters?
We wander far; we dream to wander for ever, but we dream in vain. A
surer force than the subtlest fascination of fancy is in operation.
The purse-strings tie us to our kind. Our travel-coin runs low, and we
must return, away from Tadmor and Baalbec back to our steady, tedious
industry and dull work, to ‘_la vieille Europe_ (as Napoleon said) _qui
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account