were _believed_ to be, and to be active; nor would it impair the fact
that the quiet classes awaited their onslaught in morbid apprehension,
with miserable and craven, and I fear we ought to say, _commercial_
disquietude.
You will not be misled by any highflown speculations about liberty or
equality. You will, I imagine, concede to me that the first duty of
a government is to ensure the security of that industry which is the
condition of social life and civilised cultivation; that especially in so
excitable a country as France it is necessary that the dangerous classes
should be saved from the strong temptation of long idleness; and that
no danger could be more formidable than six months’ beggary among the
revolutionary _ouvriers_, immediately preceding the exact period fixed
by European as well as French opinion for an apprehended convulsion.
It is from this state of things, whether by fair means or foul, that
Louis Napoleon has delivered France. The effect was magical. Like people
who have nearly died because it was prophesied they would die at a
specified time, and instantly recovered when they found or thought that
the time was gone and past, so France, timorously anticipating the fated
revolution, in a moment revived when she found or fancied that it was
come and over. Commerce instantly improved; New Year’s Day, when all the
Boulevards are one continued fair, has not (as I am told) been for some
years so gay and splendid; people began to buy, and consequently to sell;
for though it is quite possible, or even probable, that new misfortunes
and convulsions may be in store for the French people, yet no one can say
when they will be, and to wait till revolutions be exhausted is but the
best Parisian for our old acquaintance _Rusticus expectat_. Clever people
may now prove that the dreaded peril was a simple chimera, but they can’t
deny that the fear of it was very real and painful, nor can they dispute
that in a week after the _coup d’état_ it had at once, and apparently for
ever, passed away.
I fear it must be said that no legal or constitutional act could have
given an equal confidence. What was wanted was the assurance of an
audacious Government, which would stop at nothing, scruple at nothing,
to secure its own power and the tranquillity of the country. That
assurance all now have; a man who will in this manner dare to dissolve
an assembly constitutionally his superiors, then prevent their meeting
by armed force; so well and so sternly repress the first beginning of an
outbreak, with so little misgiving assume and exercise sole power,—may
have enormous other defects, but is certainly a bold ruler—most probably
an unscrupulous one—little likely to flinch from any inferior trial.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account