Thackeray, like Sterne, looked at everything—at nature, at life, at
art—from a _sensitive_ aspect. His mind was, to some considerable extent,
like a woman’s mind. It could comprehend abstractions when they were
unrolled and explained before it, but it never naturally created them;
never of itself, and without external obligation, devoted itself to them.
The visible scene of life—the streets, the servants, the clubs, the
gossip, the West End—fastened on his brain. These were to him reality.
They burnt in upon his brain; they pained his nerves; their influence
reached him through many avenues, which ordinary men do not feel much,
or to which they are altogether impervious. He had distinct and rather
painful sensations where most men have but confused and blurred ones.
Most men have felt the _instructive_ headache, during which they are more
acutely conscious than usual of all which goes on around them,—during
which everything seems to pain them, and in which they understand it,
because it pains them, and they cannot get their imagination away from
it. Thackeray had a nerve-ache of this sort always. He acutely felt
every possible passing fact—every trivial interlude in society. Hazlitt
used to say of himself, and used to say truly, that he could not enjoy
the society in a drawing-room for thinking of the opinion which the
footman formed of his odd appearance as he went upstairs. Thackeray
had too healthy and stable a nature to be thrown so wholly off his
balance; but the footman’s view of life was never out of his head. The
obvious facts which suggest it to the footman poured it in upon him;
he could not exempt himself from them. As most men say that the earth
_may_ go round the sun, but in fact, when we look at the sun, we cannot
help believing it goes round the earth,—just so this most impressible,
susceptible genius could not help half accepting, half believing the
common ordinary sensitive view of life, although he perfectly knew in his
inner mind and deeper nature that this apparent and superficial view of
life was misleading, inadequate, and deceptive. He could not help seeing
everything, and what he saw made so near and keen an impression upon him,
that he could not again exclude it from his understanding; it stayed
there, and disturbed his thoughts.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account