We have throughout spoken of Mr. Dickens as he was, rather than as he
is; or, to use a less discourteous phrase, and we hope a truer, of his
early works rather than of those which are more recent. We could not do
otherwise consistently with the true code of criticism. A man of great
genius, who has written great and enduring works, must be judged mainly
by them; and not by the inferior productions which, from the necessities
of personal position, a fatal facility of composition, or other cause, he
may pour forth at moments less favourable to his powers. Those who are
called on to review these inferior productions themselves, must speak of
them in the terms they may deserve; but those who have the more pleasant
task of estimating as a whole the genius of the writer, may confine their
attention almost wholly to those happier efforts which illustrate that
genius. We should not like to have to speak in detail of Mr. Dickens’s
later works, and we have not done so. There are, indeed, peculiar reasons
why a genius constituted as his is (at least if we are correct in the
view which we have taken of it) would not endure without injury during a
long life the applause of the many, the temptations of composition, and
the general excitement of existence. Even in his earlier works it was
impossible not to fancy that there was a weakness of fibre unfavourable
to the longevity of excellence. This was the effect of his deficiency in
those masculine faculties of which we have said so much,—the reasoning
understanding and firm far-seeing sagacity. It is these two component
elements which stiffen the mind, and give a consistency to the creed and
a coherence to its effects,—which enable it to protect itself from the
rush of circumstances. If to a deficiency in these we add an extreme
sensibility to circumstances,—a mobility, as Lord Byron used to call it,
of emotion, which is easily impressed, and still more easily carried
away by impression,—we have the idea of a character peculiarly unfitted
to bear the flux of time and chance. A man of very great determination
could hardly bear up against them with such slight aids from within and
with such peculiar sensibility to temptation. A man of merely ordinary
determination would succumb to it; and Mr. Dickens has succumbed. His
position was certainly unfavourable. He has told us that the works of
his later years, inferior as all good critics have deemed them, have
yet been more read than those of his earlier and healthier years. The
most characteristic part of his audience, the lower middle-class, were
ready to receive with delight the least favourable productions of his
genius. Human nature cannot endure this; it is too much to have to endure
a coincident temptation both from within and from without. Mr. Dickens
was too much inclined by natural disposition to lachrymose eloquence
and exaggerated caricature. Such was the kind of writing which he wrote
most easily. He found likewise that such was the kind of writing that
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account