contributes to the temporal happiness of man in this world; that it does
more to enlarge his hopes, stimulate his imagination, and alleviate his
sorrows, than any one other consideration; that it contributes to the
order of society and the progress of civilisation; that it is, as some
one says, ‘the last restraint of the powerful, and the last hope of the
wretched.’ Indisputably, a Being whose only motive was benevolence, who
admitted no higher consideration, who looked steadily and solely to our
mere happiness, would endeavour to instil that belief although it were
quite untrue, would not think that _that_ had anything to do with the
question, would not hesitate to make a false revelation to confirm men
in a belief so pleasant, so advantageous, so consolatory. Perhaps this
supposition drives the argument home. We see that it is necessary for us
to admit a ‘preconception’ as to the character of God before we can even
begin to prove the truth of a revelation; that we _must_ reason of ‘what
God _must_ be and God _must_ do,’ before we show that there is even a
presumption in favour of any facts, or any doctrines, which are revealed
in the ‘sacred history.’
We have hinted, in an earlier part of this essay, that this doctrine
of God’s veracity seems to us to rest on the general assumption of the
existence of a ‘perfect’ Being, who rules and controls all things. It
is, perhaps, the Divine attribute of which it is most difficult to find
a trace in nature. Of His omnipotence, justice, benevolence, we cannot,
indeed, find absolute proof; for we believe that those attributes are
infinite, and we can only prove them strictly with respect to the finite
and very circumscribed world which we see and know. Yet, at the same
time, we discern indications and strong probabilities, that the Ruler of
the world possesses these attributes; we can hardly be said to be able to
do this with His veracity. The speechlessness of nature, if we may again
so speak, deprives us of any such evidence. All Theism is of the nature
of faith. We can never prove from experience any being to be infinite,
for our experience itself is essentially small and finite. We can often,
however, as in the instance of the attributes of God above enumerated,
and of others which might be added, establish by observation that the
qualities in question exist in a certain degree, and we have only to
rely on the principle of faith for our belief that these qualities exist
in a perfect and supreme degree. In the case of the Divine veracity, it
should seem that we believe it to exist in a perfect and infinite degree,
without, from the peculiarity of our circumstances, being able to fortify
it by any test or trial from experience.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account