American essays; Literature -- History and criticism
Doubtless the wildest man New England has turned out since the red
aborigines vacated her territory was Henry Thoreau,--a man in whom the
Indian reappeared on the plane of taste and morals. One is tempted to
apply to him his own lines on “Elisha Dugan,” as it is very certain
they fit himself much more closely than they ever did his neighbor:--
“O man of wild habits,
Partridges and rabbits,
Who hast no cares.
Only to set snares,
Who liv’st all alone
Close to the bone,
And where life is sweetest
Constantly eatest.”
His whole life was a search for the wild, not only in nature but in
literature, in life, in morals. The shyest and most elusive thoughts
and impressions were the ones that fascinated him most, not only in
his own mind, but in the minds of others. His startling paradoxes are
only one form his wildness took. He cared little for science, except
as it escaped the rules and technicalities, and put him on the trail
of the ideal, the transcendental. Thoreau was of French extraction;
and every drop of his blood seems to have turned toward the aboriginal,
as the French blood has so often done in other ways in this country.
He, for the most part, despised the white man; but his enthusiasm
kindled at the mention of the Indian. He envied the Indian; he coveted
his knowledge, his arts, his woodcraft. He accredited him with a more
“practical and vital science” than was contained in the books. “The
Indian stood nearer to wild Nature than we.” “It was a new light
when my guide gave me Indian names for things for which I had only
scientific ones before. In proportion as I understood the language, I
saw them from a new point of view.” And again, “The Indian’s earthly
life was as far off from us as Heaven is.” In his “Week” he complains
that our poetry is only white man’s poetry. “If we could listen for
an instant to the chant of the Indian muse, we should understand why
he will not exchange his savageness for civilization.” Speaking of
himself, he says, “I am convinced that my genius dates from an older
era than the agricultural. I would at least strike my spade into the
earth with such careless freedom, but accuracy, as the woodpecker
his bill into a tree. There is in my nature, methinks, a singular
yearning toward all wildness.” Again and again he returns to the
Indian. “We talk of civilizing the Indian, but that is not the name
for his improvement. By the wary independence and aloofness of his
dim forest life he preserves his intercourse with his native gods,
and is admitted from time to time to a rare and peculiar society with
Nature. He has glances of starry recognition, to which our saloons are
strangers. The steady illumination of his genius, dim only because
distant, is like the faint but satisfying light of the stars compared
with the dazzling but ineffectual and short-lived blaze of candles.”
“We would not always be soothing and taming nature, breaking the horse
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account