American essays; Literature -- History and criticism
Thoreau hesitated to call himself a naturalist. That was too tame; he
would perhaps have been content to have been an Indian naturalist. He
says in this journal, and with much truth and force, “Man cannot afford
to be a naturalist, to look at Nature directly, but only with the side
of his eye. He must look through and beyond her. To look at her is as
fatal as to look at the head of Medusa. It turns the man of science to
stone.” When he was applied to by the secretary of the Association for
the Advancement of Science, at Washington, for information as to the
particular branch of science he was most interested in, he confesses
he was ashamed to answer for fear of exciting ridicule. But he says,
“If it had been the secretary of an association of which Plato or
Aristotle was the president, I should not have hesitated to describe
my studies at once and particularly.” “The fact is, I am a mystic, a
transcendentalist, and a natural philosopher to boot.” Indeed, what
Thoreau was finally after in nature was something ulterior to science,
something ulterior to poetry, something ulterior to philosophy; it
was that vague something which he calls “the higher law,” and which
eludes all direct statement. He went to Nature as to an oracle; and
though he sometimes, indeed very often, questioned her as a naturalist
and a poet, yet there was always another question in his mind. He
ransacked the country about Concord in all seasons and weathers, and
at all times of the day and night he delved into the ground, he probed
the swamps, he searched the waters, he dug into woodchuck holes,
into muskrats’ dens, into the retreats of the mice and squirrels;
he saw every bird, heard every sound, found every wild-flower, and
brought home many a fresh bit of natural history; but he was always
searching for something he did not find. This search of his for the
transcendental, the unfindable, the wild that will not be caught, he
has set forth in a beautiful parable in “Walden:”--
“I long ago lost a hound, a bay horse, and a turtle-dove, and am still
on their trail. Many are the travellers I have spoken concerning them,
describing their tracks, and what calls they answered to. I have met
one or two who had heard the hound, and the tramp of the horse, and
even seen the dove disappear behind a cloud; and they seemed as anxious
to recover them as if they had lost them themselves.”
XIV
NATURE IN LITERATURE
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account