American essays; Literature -- History and criticism
Carlyle and Ruskin fall into the same category. They sin against the
classic virtues of repose, proportion, serenity, but this makes their
penetrating power all the greater. Carlyle cannot rank with the great
impartial historians, yet as a painter of historical characters and
scenes the vividness and reality of his pictures are almost unequaled.
Carlyle lacked the disinterestedness of the true artist. He had great
power of description and characterization, but he could not as an
historian stand apart from his subject as the great Greek and Roman
historians do. He is a portion of all that he sees and describes. He
is bent upon persuasion quite as much as upon portrayal. He could not
succeed as a novelist or a poet, because of his vehement, intolerant
nature. He succeeds as an historian only in portraying men in whom he
sees the lineaments of his own character, as in Cromwell. He did not or
could not live in the whole, as did his master, Goethe. His mind was
a steep incline. His opinions were like mountain torrents. Arnold, in
one of his letters, complained that in his criticism of Goethe there
was too much of _engouement_,--too much, I suppose, of the fondness of
the gourmand for a particular dish, or of the toper for his favorite
tipple. His enthusiasm was intemperate, and therefore unsound.
Doubtless some such objection as this may be urged against most of
Carlyle’s criticisms. He was ruled by his character more than by his
intellect; his feeling guided his vision. If he is not always a light
to the reason, he is certainly an electric excitant to the imagination
and the moral sense. In his essays, pamphlets, histories, we hardly get
judicial estimates of things; rather do we get overestimates or under
estimates. Yet always is there something that kindles and brings the
blood to the surface. Carlyle will beget a stronger race than Arnold,
but it will not be so cool and clear-headed. Emerson will fertilize
more minds with new thought than Lowell, but there will be many more
cranks and fanatics and hobbyists among them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account