American essays; Literature -- History and criticism
There is one respect in which pure art and pure science agree: both
are disinterested, and seek the truth, each of its kind, for its own
sake; neither has any axe to grind. Both would live in the whole,--one
through reason and investigation, the other through imagination and
contemplation. Science seeks to understand the universe, art to enjoy
it. A man of pure science like Darwin is as disinterested as a great
artist like Shakespeare. He has no practical or secondary ends; the
truth alone is his quest. He is tracing the footsteps of creative
energy through organic nature. He is like a detective working up a
case. His theory about it is only provisional, for the moment. Every
fact is welcome to him, and the more it seems to tell against his
theory of the case, the more eagerly he weighs it and studies it.
Indeed, the man of science follows an ideal as truly as does the poet,
and will pass by fortune, honors, and all worldly success, to cleave
to it. Tolstoi thinks that science for science’ sake is as bad as art
for art’s sake; but is not knowledge a reward in itself, and is there
any higher good than that mastery of the intellect over the problems
of the universe which science gives? By bending science to particular
and secondary ends we lay the basis of our material civilization, but
it is still true that the final end of science is, not our material
benefit, but our mental enlightenment; nor is the highest end of art
the good which the preacher and the moralist seek to give us. A poem of
Milton’s or Tennyson’s carries its own proof, its own justification.
When we demand a message of the poet, or of any artist, outside of
himself, outside of the truth which he unconsciously conveys through
his own personality and point of view, we degrade his art, or destroy
that disinterestedness which is its crown. Art exists for ideal ends;
it looks askance at devotees, at doctrinaires, at all men engaged in
the dissemination of particular ideas. I am not now thinking of art
as mere craft, but as the province of man’s freest, most spontaneous,
most joyous, most complete soul activity,--the kind of activity that
has no other end, seeks no other reward, than it finds in or of itself,
the joy of being and beholding, the free play of creative energy. Art
does not rebuke vice, it depicts it; it does not urge reform, it shows
us the reformers. Its work is play, its lesson is an allegory. The
preacher works by selection and exclusion, the artist by inclusion and
contrast.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account