It must be borne in mind, as Dr. Darwin remarked many years ago, that in
dealing with memory we have to do not with laws of light, but with laws
of life, and that the misleading notion of images or ideas of objects
being stored up in the mind has been derived from our experience of the
action of light upon the retina. If we would understand the laws of
organization in the highest nerve-centres, we shall certainly do well to
study organic processes generally; it would be not less absurd to
attempt to understand the higher processes without giving attention to
the lower, than it would be to attempt to build a house without taking
pains to lay its foundations securely. It is a plain matter of
observation that other organic elements besides nervous elements
perpetuate impressions made upon them, which they may accordingly in a
certain sense be said to remember; the virus of smallpox, for example,
makes an impression upon all the elements of the body, which they never
lose, although it becomes fainter with the lapse of time; in some
unknown way it modifies their constitution so that ever afterwards their
susceptibilities are changed. The scar which is left after the healing
of a wound in a child's finger keeps the same relative proportion to the
finger through life, growing as it grows; for the elements of the new
tissue not only renew themselves particle by particle, and thus
perpetuate it, but they extend it in relation with the growth of the
surrounding parts. We need not brave the fire of psychological scorn by
calling this retention of impressions _memory_, or care greatly what it
is called, so long as due heed is given to the fact; but we may be
permitted to perceive in it the same physiological process which, in the
cortical [outer] layers of the cerebral [brain's] hemispheres, is the
condition of memory, and of habit in thought. Moreover, it may be fairly
demanded of the psychologists that they be consistent, and that they no
longer use the word memory to denote those mental processes which have
been so completely organized that they take place without consciousness;
if it be wrong, as they profess, to assume or imply an unconscious
memory, it must be still more wrong to assume or imply an unconscious
consciousness, as they sometimes do.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account