Lives of alchemystical philosophers: To which is added a bibliography of alchemy and hermetic philosophyWaite, Arthur Edward
Philosophy
Lives of alchemystical philosophers: To which is added a bibliography of alchemy and hermetic philosophy
Waite, Arthur Edward
Alchemists -- Biography; Alchemy -- Bibliography; Alchemy -- History
This physician of Montpellier, to whom chemistry is indebted for
some steps in its progress, flourished at the beginning of the
seventeenth century. He believed in the transmutation of metals, but
is not considered as an adept, though he wrote seventeen treatises
on this subject, and on the Spagiric Medicine. His most curious
work is _Alchimista Christianus_. Toulouse, 1632, 8vo. In _Hercules
Piochymicus_, published at the same place two years later, he maintains
that the labours of Hercules are allegories, which contain the arcana
of Hermetic philosophy.
He defines the philosophical stone as the seed out of which gold and
silver are generated. It is three and yet one; it may be found in all
compounded substances, and is formed of salt, mercury, and sulphur,
which, however, are not to be confounded with the vulgar substances so
denominated.
HELVETIUS.
The following singularly impressive and even convincing testimony to
the alleged fact of metallic transmutation was published by the eminent
Dutch physician, John Frederick Helvetius, at the Hague in 1667, and
was dedicated to his friends, Dr Retius of Amsterdam, Dr Hansius of
Heidelberg, and Dr Menzelin of Brandeburg.
“On the 27th December 1666, in the afternoon, a stranger, in a plain,
rustic dress, came to my house at the Hague. His manner of address was
honest, grave, and authoritative; his stature was low, with a long
face and hair black, his chin smooth. He seemed like a native of the
north of Scotland, and I guessed he was about forty-four years old.
After saluting me, he requested me most respectfully to pardon his rude
intrusion, but that his love of the pyrotechnic art made him visit
me. Having read some of my small treatises, particularly that against
the sympathetic powder of Sir Kenelm Digby, and observed therein my
doubt of the Hermetic mystery, it caused him to request this interview.
He asked me if I still thought there was no medicine in Nature which
could cure all diseases, unless the principal parts, as the lungs,
liver, &c., were perished, or the time of death were come. To which
I replied, I never met with an adept, or saw such a medicine, though
I read much of it, and often wished for it. Then I asked if he was
a physician. He said he was a founder of brass, yet from his youth
learned many rare things in chemistry, particularly of a friend--the
manner to extract out of metals many medicinal arcana by the use of
fire. After discoursing of experiments in metals, he asked me, Would
I know the philosophers’ stone if I saw it? I answered, I would not;
though I read much of it in Paracelsus, Helmont, Basil, and others, yet
I dare not say I could know the philosophers’ matter. In the interim
he drew from his breast pocket a neat ivory box, and out of it took
three ponderous lumps of the stone, each about the size of a small
walnut. They were transparent and of a pale brimstone colour, whereto
some scales of the crucible adhered when this most noble substance
was melted.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account