Lives of Boulton and Watt. Principally from the Original Soho Mss.: Comprising also a history of the invention and introduction of the steam engineSmiles, Samuel
History
Lives of Boulton and Watt. Principally from the Original Soho Mss.: Comprising also a history of the invention and introduction of the steam engine
Want of water-power was one of the great defects of Soho as a
manufacturing establishment, and for a long time Boulton struggled with
the difficulty. The severe summer droughts obliged him to connect a
horse-mill with the water-wheel. From six to ten horses were employed as
an auxiliary power, at an expense of from five to eight guineas a week.
But this expedient, though costly, was found very inconvenient. Boulton
next thought of erecting a pumping-engine after Savery or Newcomen’s
construction, for the purpose of raising the water from the mill-stream
and returning it back into the reservoir--thereby maintaining a head of
water sufficient to supply the water-wheel and keep the mill in regular
work. “The enormous expense of the horse-power,” he wrote to a friend,
“put me upon thinking of turning the mill by fire, and I made many
fruitless experiments on the subject.”
In 1766 we find him engaged in a correspondence with the distinguished
Benjamin Franklin as to steam power. Eight years before, Franklin had
visited Boulton at Birmingham and made his acquaintance. They were
mutually pleased with each other, and continued to correspond during
Franklin’s stay in England, exchanging their views on magnetism,
electricity, and other subjects.[110] When Boulton began to study the
fire-engine with a view to its improvement, Franklin was one of the first
whom he consulted. Writing him on the 22nd February, 1766, he said,--
“My engagements since Christmas have not permitted me to make any
further progress with my fire-engine; but, as the thirsty season
is approaching apace, necessity will oblige me to set about it
in good earnest. Query,--Which of the steam-valves do you like
best? Is it better to introduce the jet of cold water at the
bottom of the receiver, or at the top? Each has its advantages
and disadvantages. My thoughts about the secondary or mechanical
contrivances of the engine are too numerous to trouble you with
in this letter, and yet I have not been lucky enough to hit upon
any that are objectionless. I therefore beg, if any thought occurs
to your fertile genius which you think may be useful, or preserve
me from error in the execution of this engine, you’ll be so kind
as to communicate it to me, and you’ll very greatly oblige me.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account