Lives of Boulton and Watt. Principally from the Original Soho Mss.: Comprising also a history of the invention and introduction of the steam engineSmiles, Samuel
History
Lives of Boulton and Watt. Principally from the Original Soho Mss.: Comprising also a history of the invention and introduction of the steam engine
[135] Richard Lovell Edgeworth says of this distinguished
coterie,--“By means of Mr. Keir I became acquainted with Dr.
Small of Birmingham, a man esteemed by all who knew him, and
by all who were admitted to his friendship beloved with no
common enthusiasm. Dr. Small formed a link which combined Mr.
Boulton, Mr. Watt, Dr. Darwin, Mr. Wedgwood, Mr. Day, and myself
together--men of very different characters, but all devoted
to literature and science. This mutual intimacy has never
been broken but by death, nor have any of the number failed to
distinguish themselves in science or literature. Some may think
that I ought with due modesty to except myself. Mr. Keir with
his knowledge of the world and good sense; Dr. Small, with his
benevolence and profound sagacity; Wedgwood, with his increasing
industry, experimental variety, and calm investigation; Boulton,
with his mobility, quick perception, and bold adventure; Watt,
with his strong inventive faculty, undeviating steadiness,
and bold resources; Darwin, with his imagination, science, and
poetical excellence; and Day, with his unwearied research after
truth, his integrity and eloquence;--proved altogether such a
society as few men have had the good fortune to live with; such
an assemblage of friends, as fewer still have had the happiness
to possess, and keep through life.”--Memoirs, i. 186.
Boulton could not have been very sanguine at first as to the success of
Watt’s engine. There were a thousand difficulties in the way of getting
it introduced to general use. The principal one was the difficulty of
finding workmen capable of making it. Watt had been constantly worried
by “villanous bad workmen,” who failed to make any model that would go
properly. It mattered not that the principle of the engine was right;
if its construction was beyond the skill of ordinary handicraftsmen,
the invention was practically worthless. The great Smeaton was of this
opinion. When he saw the first model working at Soho, he admitted the
excellence of the contrivance, but predicted its failure, on the ground
that it was too complicated, and that workmen were not to be found capable
of manufacturing it on any large scale for general uses.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account