Lives of Boulton and Watt. Principally from the Original Soho Mss.: Comprising also a history of the invention and introduction of the steam engineSmiles, Samuel
History
Lives of Boulton and Watt. Principally from the Original Soho Mss.: Comprising also a history of the invention and introduction of the steam engine
“We want more Murdocks,” he wrote on one occasion, “for, of all
our men he is the most active. He is the best engine erector I
ever saw, and of his energy I had one of the best proofs this day.
They stopped Poldice lower engine last Monday and took her all
to pieces; took out the condenser, took up out of the shaft the
greatest part of the pumps, took the nozzles to pieces, cut out
the iron seatings and put in brass ones with new valves, mended
the eduction-pipe, and did a great number of repairs about the
beam and engine; put the pumps down into the new engine shaft,
did much work at the new engine; and this done, about noon both
the engines, new and old, were set to work again complete. When I
look at the work done it astonishes me, and is entirely owing to
the spirit and activity of Murdock, who hath not gone to bed for
three nights, and I expect the mine will be in full fork again by
Wednesday night. I have got him into good humour again without any
coaxing, have prevailed on him not to give up Wheal Virgin engine,
which he had been resolved to do from the ungenerous treatment he
received from the captains. I have also prevailed on him to put
off his determined journey to Scotland until North Downs engines
are got to work, and have quieted his mind about wheel carriages
till then.”[266]
[266] Boulton to Watt, 8th November, 1784. Though Murdock was
thus occupied, he did not abandon his idea of making a working
locomotive. Two years later we find Watt thus writing Boulton:--
“I am extremely sorry that W. Murdock still busies himself
with the steam carriages. In one of my specifications I
have secured it, as well as words could do, according
to my idea of it, and if to that you add Symington’s
and Sadler’s patents, it can scarcely be patentable,
even if free of the general specification in the Act of
Parliament; for even granting that what I have done cannot
secure it, yet it can act as a prior invention against
anybody else; and if it cannot be secured by patent, to
what purpose should anybody labour at it? I have still the
same opinions concerning it that I had, but to prevent
as much as possible more fruitless argument about it, I
have one of some size under hand, and am resolved to try
if God will work a miracle in favour of these carriages.
I shall in some future letter send you the words of my
specification on that subject. In the mean time I wish
William could be brought to do as we do, to mind the
business in hand, and let such as Symington and Sadler
throw away their time and money in hunting shadows.”--Watt
to Boulton, 12th Sept., 1786. In a subsequent letter, Watt
expresses himself as much gratified to learn “that William
applies to his business.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account