Lives of Fair and Gallant Ladies. Vol 2.Brantôme, Pierre de Bourdeille
History
Lives of Fair and Gallant Ladies. Vol 2.
Brantôme, Pierre de Bourdeille
Erotic literature
She did bear exceeding hardly the loss and absence of her son, and
this in spite of all possible excuses which King Henri did make her,
and his declared intention of adopting him as his son. But presently,
finding no assuagement, and seeing how they were giving him one M.
de La Brousse as tutor, instead of the one he now had, namely M. de
Montbardon, a very wise and honourable gentleman the Emperor himself
had assigned to that office, having long known him for a worthy man,
for he had been in the service of M. de Bourbon, and was a French
refugee, the Princess, thinking all desperate, did seek out King Henri
one Holy Thursday in the great Gallery at Nancy, where all his Court
was assembled. Thus, with an assured grace and that great beauty which
did make her yet more admirable, she did advance, with no undue awe or
any sort of abasement at his grandeur, albeit bowing low in reverence
before him; and in suppliant wise, with tears in her eyes, the which
did but make her more fair and more delightsome to look upon, did
remonstrate with the King as to the wrong he was doing her in taking
away her son,—the dearest possession she had in all the world. Little
did she deserve, she added, so harsh treatment, seeing the high station
she was born in and the fact she had never dreamed of doing aught to
his disservice. All this she said so well and with so excellent a
grace, with reasoning so cogent and complaint so pitiful, as that the
King, always very courteous toward ladies, was deeply stirred with
compassion,—and not he alone, but all the Lords and Princes, great and
small, which were present at the sight.
The King, who was the most respectful monarch toward ladies hath ever
been in France, did answer her in very honourable terms, albeit with
no rigmarole of words nor by way of set harangue, as Paradin doth
represent the matter in his _History of France_; for indeed of his
nature this monarch was not so prolix, nor copious in reasons and fine
speeches, nor a mighty orator. Neither had he any need to be, nor is
it becoming that a King should play the philosopher and rhetorician,
the shortest replies and briefest questions being more meet for him and
more becoming. This I have heard argued by not a few great men, amongst
others by M. de Pibrac,[109*] whose judgment was much to be relied on
by reason of the competence of knowledge he did possess. Moreover any
one that shall read the speech as given by Paradin, as supposed by him
to have been delivered in this place by King Henri, will credit never
a word of it; besides which, I have heard positively from a number
of great folk which were there present that he did not make any such
lengthy harangue as the historian saith.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account