Lives of the apostles of Jesus ChristBacon, David Francis
Religion
Lives of the apostles of Jesus Christ
Bacon, David Francis
Apostles
The fullest account ever given of this fable and all its
progress, is found in the Annales Ecclesiastici of Caesar
Baronius, (A. C. 44. § 51‒59.) who, after furnishing the most
ample references to sacred and profane authorities, which
palpably demonstrate the falsity of the story, returns with all
the solemn bigotry of a papist, to the solemn conviction that
the fathers and the saints who tell the story, _must_ have had
some very good reason for believing it.
The other copyists of Justin hardly deserve any notice; but it
is interesting and instructive to observe how, in the progress
of fabulous invention, one lie is pinned on to the tail of
another, to form a glorious chain of historical sequences, for
some distant ecclesiastical annalist to hang his servile faith
upon. Eusebius, for instance, enlarges the stories of Justin
and Irenaeus, by an addition of his own,――that in his day there
existed a sect which acknowledged this same Simon as God, and
worshiped him and Helena or Selena, with some mysteriously
wicked rites. Now all that his story amounts to, is, that in his
time there was a sect called by a name resembling that of Simon,
how nearly like it, no one knows; but that by his own account
their worship was of a secret character, so that he could, of
course, know nothing certainly. But this is enough for him to
add, as a solemn confirmation of a story now known to have been
founded in falsehood. From this beginning, Eusebius goes on
to say that Peter went to Rome in the second year of Claudius,
to war against this Simon Magus, who never went there; so that
we know how much this whole tale is worth by looking into the
circumstance which constitutes its essential foundation. The
idea of Peter’s visit to Rome at that time, is no where given
before Eusebius, except in some part of the Clementina, a long
series of most unmitigated falsehoods, forged in the name of
Clemens Romanus, without any certain date, but commonly supposed
to have been made up of the continued contributions of several
impudent liars, during different portions of the second, third
and fourth centuries.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account