Lives of the apostles of Jesus ChristBacon, David Francis
Religion
Lives of the apostles of Jesus Christ
Bacon, David Francis
Apostles
them, while their preaching and instruction was still sounding
in his ears.” Irenaeus then enumerates the succeeding bishops,
down to Eleutherius, “who,” he says, “is now the twelfth bishop
from the apostles.” In the preceding section, Irenaeus tells
us that Matthew wrote his gospel “while Peter and Paul were
preaching, and founding the church at Rome.”
Here is full and explicit testimony, that Paul and Peter,
unitedly, preached and founded the church at Rome; and that they
constituted LINUS THE FIRST BISHOP there. The language _excludes
both Peter and Paul_,――and excludes both equally, _from the
episcopal chair at Rome_. “They committed the episcopacy to
Linus;” who was the first bishop, as Clement was the third,
and Eleutherius the twelfth. Contemporary with Irenaeus was
Dionysius, bishop of Corinth. In reply to a monitory letter
from the Romish church, of which Eusebius (Church History,
II. 25,) has preserved an extract, Dionysius says: “By this your
excellent admonition, you have united in one the planting, by
Peter and Paul, of the Romans and Corinthians. For both of them
coming to our Corinth, planted and instructed us;――and in like
manner, going to Italy together,――after teaching there, they
suffered martyrdom at the same time.” From this testimony we may
learn how and when Peter went to Rome; as well as what relation
he sustained to the church there. He and Paul came to Corinth
together; and when they had regulated and instructed that church,
they went on together to Italy, and did the same things at Rome
as before at Corinth. Now this, if true, must have been after
the captivity of Paul at Rome, mentioned in the book of Acts.
For Paul never went directly from Corinth to Rome before that
captivity, since he never was at Rome before he was carried
there a prisoner, in the year A. D. 62. But, if released in the
year 64, he might have visited Corinth afterwards, with Peter,
and then have traveled with him to Rome. To the church of Rome,
Peter and Paul sustained the same relation; and that was the
same as they had sustained to the church of Corinth, viz. that
of _apostolic teachers and founders_,――not that of ORDINARY
BISHOPS. That is, Peter was no more the bishop of Rome than
Paul was; and neither of them, any more the bishop of Rome than
both were bishops of Corinth. Dionysius likewise, here affirms,
that Peter and Paul suffered martyrdom “at the same time;” and
probably at Rome, where they last taught. That Rome was the
place is proved by Caius, a Romish ecclesiastic, about A. D. 200,
as quoted by Eusebius, (Church History, II. 25.) “I am able,”
says he, “to show the trophies [the sepulchers] of the apostles.
For if you will go to the Vatican, or along the Via Ostia, you
will find the trophies of those who established this church.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account