Lives of the apostles of Jesus ChristBacon, David Francis
Religion
Lives of the apostles of Jesus Christ
Bacon, David Francis
Apostles
feeding the five thousand, and to a subsequent similar one. However,
the various great actions of a similar character, thus repeated before
them, seem at last to have had a proper effect, since, on an occasion
not long after, they boldly and clearly made their profession of faith
in Jesus, as the Christ.
“_A lonely place._”――The word _desert_, which is the adjective
given in this passage, in the common English version, (Matthew
xiv. 13, 15, Mark vi. 31, 32, 35, Luke ix. 10, 12,) does not
convey to the reader, the true idea of the character of the
place. The Greek word Ερημος (_eremos_) does not in the passages
just quoted, mean “_desert_,” in our modern sense of that
English word, which always conveys the idea of “desolation,”
“wildness” and “barrenness,” as well as “solitude.” But the
Greek word by no means implied these darker characteristics. The
primary, uniform idea of the word is, “_lonely_,” “_solitary_,”
and so little does it imply “barrenness,” that it is applied
to lands, rich, fertile and pleasant, a connection, of course,
perfectly inconsistent with our ideas of a _desert_ place.
Schleusner gives the idea very fairly under Ερημια, (_eremia_,)
a derivative of this word. “Notat locum aliquem vel tractum
terrae, non tam _incultum_ et _horridum_, quam minus habitabilem,
――_solitudinem_,――locum vacuum quidem ab hominibus, _pascuis_
tamen et _agris abundantem_, et _arboribus obsitum_.” “It means
a place or tract of land, not so much uncultivated and wild, as
it does one thinly inhabited,――a solitude, a place empty of men
indeed, yet rich in pastures and fields, and planted with trees.”
But after giving this very clear and satisfactory account of
the derivative, he immediately after gives to the primitive
itself, the primary meaning “_desertus, desolatus, vastus,
devastatus_,” and refers to passages where the word is applied
to ruined cities; but in every one of those passages, the
true idea is that above given as the meaning, “stripped of
inhabitants,” and not “desolated” or “laid waste.” Hedericus
gives this as the first meaning, “_desertus, solus, solitarius,
inhabitatus_.” Schneider also fully expresses it, in German,
by “_einsam_,” (_lonely, solitary_,) in which he is followed by
Passow, his improver, and by Donnegan, his English translator.
Jones and Pickering, also give it thus. Bretschneider and Wahl,
in their New Testament Lexicons, have given a just and proper
classification of the meanings. The word “_desert_” came into
our English translation, by the minute verbal adherence of the
translators to the Vulgate or Latin version, where the word is
expressed by “_desertum_” probably enough because _desertus_,
in Latin, does not mean _desert_ in English, nor any thing like
it, but simply “lonely,” “uninhabited;”――in short, it has the
force of the English participle, “_deserted_,” and not of the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account