Lives of the early Medici : $b As told in their correspondence
History
Lives of the early Medici : $b As told in their correspondence
Florence (Italy) -- History; Medici, Cosimo de', 1389-1464; Medici, House of; Medici, Lorenzo de', 1449-1492; Medici, Piero de', 1416-1469
it, but the state of things does not seem to me propitious. Perhaps
I am not enough versed in all the secrets and therefore see and
anticipate wrongly. His Holiness must have some promises or hopes, for
the choice lies between Spain and France. Spain does not appear to me
strong enough, particularly as regards money. What reliance is to be
placed on France, seeing the French nature, I know not. Supposing she
changed her nature I should agree with our Holy Father that it would
be the best solution, for there would be less danger in augmenting the
power of one of the house of Lorraine than of Spain, for the Duke of
Lorraine is not King of France and we see by experience that the King
of Naples is far more influenced by Spain than the Duke of Lorraine is
by France. It is true the Kings of Naples and Spain are not friends,
and that whoever is King of Naples would work for his own hand. For
all these reasons, although there may be others I do not understand,
I cannot advise the Pope to undertake such an enterprise now; and
in that case it is unwise to exasperate the King with citations and
other threats. Even were His Holiness fully prepared to go forward I
think he ought to avoid the slightest sign of ill-will, in order not
to incur any danger from what the King might say or do. This danger
seems to me to exist, therefore he would do better to dissimulate
and make secret preparations, than to show anger before being ready
to strike, which would only give an opportunity to others to make
ready and to attack. So for every reason in the first proposition I
do not think it wise to cite the King. As to the second I may also be
mistaken, because conditions may have been proposed of which I am not
aware, and which may be rendered feasible by this very citation, if
the affair is matured and almost settled. In this case the assumption
of superiority may help to decide matters. But if there is nothing
more than I know the affair seems embittered and not at all easy of
solution; therefore such methods might lead to a scandal or even
to an open rupture, instead of to an agreement. The advantages of
temporising cannot, I think, be denied. There can be no doubt that
it is better to arrange matters, having due regard to the reputation
of His Holiness, than to tempt fortune; for you know better than I
do that the King can do much harm. But, as I said before, I do not
know enough about these matters so cannot say more. If the Pope has
good reasons for his fearless attitude let me know them to relieve my
mind, for though not of a timid nature I am far more anxious about
his affairs than about my own, because of the trust he reposes in
me. If His Holiness is satisfied, I have such faith in his prudence
and authority that I shall be tranquillised. But until I hear these
reasons I confess that I am uneasy. For the love of God let me know,
as I do not feel at all well. The Pope must not on any account imagine
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account