Lives of the Founders of the British Museum, Part 1 of 2: With Notices of Its Chief Augmentors and Other Benefactors, 1570-1870.Edwards, Edward
History
Lives of the Founders of the British Museum, Part 1 of 2: With Notices of Its Chief Augmentors and Other Benefactors, 1570-1870.
Edwards, Edward
Book collectors -- Great Britain; British Museum
‘[Then the Duke] came to the Relation of Sir Robert Cotton [of the
intercourse] that he had with the Spanish Ambassador in 1614 [O.S.].
The Spanish Ambassador came to his house pretending [a desire] to
see his rarities. On the 10th of February he acquainted His Majesty
with it. Somerset [had] warrant then to sound the life of the
intention. [Gondomar] told him he doubted he had no warrant to set
any such thing on foot. [On the] 16th of March the Spanish
Ambassador dealt with him and endeavoured to make Somerset Spanish,
and to further this match. [He] answered him that there were divers
rubs and difficulties in it. [On the] 9th of April he gave
[Gondomar] a pill in a paper—viz. three reasons: If the King of
Spain would not urge unreasonable things in Religion, then,’ &c. [as
in Gondomar’s letter, which I have already quoted]. ‘Afterwards Sir
Robert Cotton was questioned [for shewing] to the Ambassador of
Spain a packet [received] from Spain.... [In the year] 1616, His
Majesty told Sir Robert Cotton that Gondomar had counterfeited those
letters, and that he was a “juggling jack.”’ Here Sir Edward Coke
interposed. He was one of the Managers of the Conference for the
Commons. He spoke thus: ‘This matter has a little relation to me. I
committed Sir Robert Cotton, when I was Chief Justice. For I
understood he had intelligence with the Spanish Ambassador, and
questioned him for it. _For no subject ought to converse with
Ambassadors without the King’s leave._ For the offence [for which] I
committed him [Sir Robert had] afterwards his general pardon from
the King.’ _Journals of the House of Commons_, 4 March, 1624. Vol.
I, pp. 727, 728.
Footnote 9:
‘... Por diferentes vias le confirmado que contra el Conde
[Somerset] no se averigua cosa de sustancia en lo de la muerte del
Ovarberi; y de la del Principe [Henry, Prince of Wales,] no ha
permetido el Rey que se hable en ella; y todo lo demas probado hasta
agora viene a parar en que dio un decreto antes que le prendiesen,
para recojer unos papeles, diziendo que era orden del Rey, sin
haverla tenido para ello. Fue lo que causo su prision, y el aver
entregado despues todos los papeles que tenia de importancia, con
algunas joyas, a un amigo suyo [Sir Robert Cotton], para que lo
guardase que se coxieron. _Y el Rey ha sentido infinito que se ayan
visto algunos papeles que havia suyos para el Conde, ... y assi
carga agora toda la yra sobre el Conde_,’ &c. Gondomar to Philip
III,—Simancas MS. 2595, f. 23; and in _Archæologia_ (by Gardiner),
vol. xli, p. 29.
Footnote 10:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account