Lives of the Founders of the British Museum, Part 2 of 2: With Notices of Its Chief Augmentors and Other Benefactors, 1570-1870.Edwards, Edward
History
Lives of the Founders of the British Museum, Part 2 of 2: With Notices of Its Chief Augmentors and Other Benefactors, 1570-1870.
Edwards, Edward
Book collectors -- Great Britain; British Museum
Your Committee have, therefore, thought it their duty at the outset to
examine whether all the Natural History Collections, viz. the
Zoological and Botanical, in addition to the Geological,
Palæontological, and Mineralogical, specified in the Treasury Minute,
might with propriety and advantage be removed from the present British
Museum buildings. [Sidenote: ALL COLLECTIONS OF NATURAL HISTORY TO BE
REMOVED.] The importance, as regards science, of preserving together
all objects of Natural History, was forcibly urged by Sir R.
MURCHISON, at the special general meeting of the third of December. In
a Memorial laid before the Chancellor of the Exchequer in 1858, and
signed by more than one hundred and twenty eminent promoters and
cultivators of science,[52] it was represented ‘that as the chief end
and aim of natural history is to demonstrate the harmony which
pervades the whole, and the unity of principle, which bespeaks the
unity of the Creative Cause, it is essential that the different
classes of natural objects should be preserved in juxtaposition under
the roof of one great building.’ Your Committee concur in this
opinion, and they have come to the conclusion that it is essential to
the advantage of science and of the collections which are to remain in
Bloomsbury, that the removal of all the objects of Natural History
should take place, and, as far as practicable, should be
simultaneously effected.
[Sidenote: BOTANY.]
With regard to Botany, it is a question whether the existence of the
Royal Botanical Gardens at Kew does not suggest an exception as to the
place to which the British Museum Botanical Collection should be
removed, reserving a small series for the illustration of fossil
Botany, in connexion with Palæontology.
It is to be kept in view that the removal of the Palæontology,
Geology, and Mineralogy, would leave unoccupied only two very
inconveniently placed rooms in the basement, besides the north half of
the north gallery on the upper floor (about four hundred feet in
length, by thirty-six in width); whereas the recently imported marbles
from Halicarnassus, Cnidus, Geronta, and Cyrene, fill completely the
space under the colonnade, extending to about five hundred and forty
feet in length. Nor can your Committee omit to add, that should the
removal of the Botany and Zoology be delayed, the final and systematic
arrangement of the collections which are to remain must be equally
delayed; while, if any portions of these were removed to other
situations in the Museum, or their final transfer postponed, many of
the objects retained would have again to be shifted for the sake of
congruity and economy of space.
It is, therefore, recommended by your Committee, that all the Natural
History Collections be speedily and simultaneously removed.
[Sidenote: ETHNOLOGICAL COLLECTION TO BE REMOVED.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account