Lives of the most eminent literary and scientific men of France, Vol. 2 (of 2)Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft
Science
Lives of the most eminent literary and scientific men of France, Vol. 2 (of 2)
Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft
Authors, French -- Biography
It is impossible to imagine a character in stronger contrast with
Voltaire, than that of Rousseau. They possessed but one quality in
common. It is difficult to know what to call it. In ordinary men it
would be named egotism, or vanity. It is that lively and intimate
apprehension of their own individuality, sensations, and being, which
appears to be one of the elements of that order of minds which feel
impelled to express their thoughts and disseminate their views and
opinions through the medium of writing;--men of imagination, and
eloquence, and mental energy. This quality is good as long as it renders
an author diligent, earnest, and sincere; it is evil when it deprives
him of the power of justly appreciating his powers and position, and
causes him to fancy himself the centre, as it were, of the universe.
Rousseau was its victim; it was exaggerated till his mind became
diseased; and one false idea becoming fixed and absorbing, a sort of
madness ensued. He was too alive to the sense of his own actions and
feelings; and as he had committed many faults, not to say crimes, the
recollection of these, joined to his sincere love of virtue, produced a
struggle in his mind full, of misery and remorse.
Jean Jacques Rousseau was born at Geneva, on the 28th June, 1712. His
birth cost the life of his mother, and was, he says, "the first of his
misfortunes." His father was a watchmaker, and clever in his trade--it
was all he had to subsist upon. Jean Jacques was born weakly, and with
some organic defect, that rendered the rearing difficult and precarious.
A sister of his father devoted herself to him. According to his own
account, his childish years were happy. Loved and caressed by many
relations, and watched over by his aunt, he was indulged without being
spoiled. His father taught him to read, after the business of the day
was over. That his attention might be excited, the long romances of
Scudéri and the elder Crebillon were put into his hands. His father
shared the pleasure he took in this occupation, and parent and child
often sat up all night to indulge in it: a taste for the romantic, and a
precocious knowledge of the language of passion and sentiment, were thus
impressed upon the boy. When the collection of romances was ended, they
turned to other books. They had a good collection, being a portion of
the library of his mother's father, a minister of the church. The
"History of the Church and the Empire," by Le Seur; Bossuet's "Discourse
on Universal History;" Plutarch's "Lives;" Ovid's "Metamorphoses;" the
works of Molière, La Bruyère, and Fontenelle, were among them. The boy
read to his father as he sat at work.
[Sidenote: 1720.
Ætat.
8.]
"I thus," Rousseau writes "imbibed a singular taste, perhaps unexampled
at my age. Plutarch, above all, became my favourite reading, and the
pleasure I took in it cured me somewhat of my love for romances, and I
soon learnt to prefer Agesilas, Brutus, and Aristides, to Oorondates,
Artamenes, and Juba.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account