Lives of the most eminent literary and scientific men of France, Vol. 2 (of 2)Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft
Science
Lives of the most eminent literary and scientific men of France, Vol. 2 (of 2)
Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft
Authors, French -- Biography
However, to go back to narrative. Rousseau instituted Theresa his
housekeeper, assisted in the maintenance of her relatives, and found, in
the convenience and attention which these domestic arrangements brought
with them, a great alleviation to his physical sufferings.
[Sidenote: 1749.
Ætat.
37.]
This same year was memorable on another and important score. Among his
Parisian friends, there was none to whom he was more attached than
Diderot, a man of an amiable disposition, and possessed of greater
abilities in the eyes of those who personally knew him, than he has
developed in his writings. Some people in power were displeased at
certain personal allusions in his "Letter on the Blind." According to
the nefarious system of the old regime, the result was, a _lettre de
cachet_, and his being imprisoned in the keep of the castle of
Vincennes. Rousseau was penetrated by indignation and anguish. He
fancied that his friend would never be liberated; he figured to himself
all that a man of ardent and yet feeble temperament would suffer in
solitary confinement. He wrote to implore madame de Pompadour to exert
her influence, either to procure his liberation, or to admit of him,
Rousseau, being shut up with him. On all occasions he was energetic in
representing the unmerited sufferings to which his friend was exposed.
After a period, the confinement of Diderot was mitigated. The castle and
park of Vincennes, on parole, were given him for a prison, with liberty
to see his friends. Rousseau hastened to avail himself of this
permission, and frequently walked to Vincennes to pass the afternoons in
relieving the solitude of his friend. The way was long, the summer
sultry, his pace slow. He read as he walked along; and once took with
him the "Mercure de France" to beguile the way; as he looked it over, he
fell upon the question proposed by the Academy of Dijon, as the subject
for the prize of the following year--"Whether the progress of the arts
and sciences had tended to corrupt or purify the manners of men." The
words touched a chord that revealed a power, latent in his heart,
undreamt of before. The scroll of society unrolled itself before him,
such as he found it, blotted and tainted, in the city of the earth that
boasted to be the most advanced in the cultivation of the arts and
sciences. And beside it he placed a picture of pristine innocence,--of
man enjoying the full development of his physical powers; living for the
day as it rose, untouched by care, unbewildered by intellectual
speculations,--by vanity, emulation, or pride;--man liberated from the
control of opinion and the tyranny of his own unreasonable desires.
Words descriptive of such a state poured into his mind; expressions of
burning eloquence seemed to cluster on his lips, and to demand a voice.
Before he could transfer his thoughts to paper, much was lost; but
enough remained to gain for him the reputation of being one of the most
eloquent authors that ever lived.[8]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account