Lives of the Queens of England of the House of Hanover, volume 1 (of 2)Doran, Dr. (John)
History
Lives of the Queens of England of the House of Hanover, volume 1 (of 2)
Doran, Dr. (John)
Hanover, House of; Queens -- Great Britain -- Biography
The Queen’s greatest triumph was this overcoming of her husband’s
personal hatred for Walpole. It could not have been an achievement
easy to be accomplished. But her art in effecting such achievements
was supreme, and she alone could turn to her own purpose the caprices
of a hot-headed man, of whom it has been said, that he was of iron
obstinacy, but that he was unlike iron in this, that the hotter he
became the more impossible it was to bend him. Caroline found him
pliant when she found him cool. But then, too, he was most wary, and it
was necessary so to act as to cause every turn which she compelled him
to make appear to himself as if it were the result of his own unbiassed
volition.
Supremely able as Caroline was, she could not, however, always conceal
her emotion. Thus, at this very period of the agitation of the Excise
bill, on being told, at one of her evening drawing-rooms, of the
difficulties and dangers which beset the path of the government, she
burst into tears, became unusually excited, and finally affecting,
and perhaps feeling, headache and vapours, she broke up her quadrille
party, and betrayed in her outward manner an apparent conviction of
impending calamity. She evinced the same weakness on being told, on a
subsequent evening, that Walpole was in a majority of only seventeen.
Such a small majority she felt was a defeat; and, on this occasion,
she again burst into tears, and for the first time expressed a fear
that the court _must_ give way! The sovereign was, at the same time, as
strong within her as the woman; and when she heard of the subordinate
holders of government posts voting against the minister or declining to
vote with him, she bitterly denounced them, exclaiming, that they who
refused to march with their leader were as guilty as they who openly
deserted, and that both merited condign punishment.[11]
The King on this occasion was as excited as his consort, but he
manifested his feelings in a different way. He made Lord Hervey repeat
the names of those who thwarted the views of the crown, and he grunted
forth an angry commentary at each name. ‘Lord John Cavendish,’ began
Hervey. ‘_A fool!_’ snorted the King. ‘Lord Charles Cavendish.’ ‘_Half
mad!_’ ‘Sir William Lowther.’ ‘_A whimsical fellow!_’ ‘Sir Thomas
Prendergast.’ ‘_An Irish blockhead!_’ ‘Lord Tyrconnel.’ ‘_A puppy_,’
said George, ‘who never votes twice _on the same side_!’
On the other hand, the populace made _their_ comment on the proceedings
of the court. It was rendered in a highly popular way, and with much
significancy. In the city of London, for instance, the mob hung in
effigy Sir Robert Walpole and a _fat woman_. The male figure was duly
ticketed. The female effigy was well understood to mean the Queen.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account