Lives of the Queens of England of the House of Hanover, volume 1 (of 2)Doran, Dr. (John)
History
Lives of the Queens of England of the House of Hanover, volume 1 (of 2)
Doran, Dr. (John)
Hanover, House of; Queens -- Great Britain -- Biography
Let us do the prince the justice to say, that, in asking that his
income might be doubled, he did not ask that the money should be drawn
from the public purse. When Bubb Dodington first advised him to apply
to parliament for a grant, his answer was spirited enough. ‘The people
have done quite enough for my family already, and I would rather beg
my bread from door to door than be a charge to them.’ What he asked
for was, that out of his father’s civil list of nearly a million
sterling per annum, he might be provided with a more decent revenue
than a beggarly fifty thousand a-year, paid at his father’s pleasure.
Pulteney’s motion was denounced by ministers as an infraction of the
King’s prerogative. Well, Frederick could not get the cash he coveted
from the King, and he would not take it from the public. Bubb Dodington
had advised him to apply to parliament, and he rewarded Bubb for the
hint by easing him occasionally of a few thousands at play. He exulted
in winning. ‘I have just nicked Dodington,’ said he on one occasion,
‘out of 5,000_l._, and Bubb has no chance of ever getting it again!’
The battle, however, was not yet concluded. The prince’s party
resolved to make the same motion in the Lords which had been made in
the Commons. The King and Queen meanwhile considered that they were
released from their engagement, whereby the prince’s revenue was to
be placed entirely in his own power. They were also anxious to eject
their son from St. James’s. Good counsel, nevertheless, prevailed over
them to some extent, and they did not proceed to any of the extremities
threatened by them. In the meantime, the scene within the palace was
one to make a very stoic sigh. The son had daily intercourse with one
or both of his parents. He led the Queen by the hand to dinner, and
she could have stabbed him on the way; for her wrath was more bitter
than ever against him, for the reason that he had introduced her name,
through his friends, in the parliamentary debate, in a way which she
considered must compromise her reputation with the people of England.
He had himself declared to the councillors who had brought him the
terms of the King’s offer, that he had frequently applied through the
Queen for an interview with the King, at which an amicable arrangement
of their differences might be made; but that she had prevented such
an interview, by neglecting to make the prince’s wishes known to his
father. This story was repeated by the prince’s friends in parliament,
and Caroline called heaven and earth to witness that her son had
grossly and deliberately lied. In this temper the two often sat down to
dinner at the same table. As for the King, although Frederick attended
the royal _levées_, and stood near his royal sire, the latter never
affected to behold or to consider him as present, and he invariably
spoke of him as a brainless, impertinent puppy and scoundrel.[28]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account