Lives of the Queens of England of the House of Hanover, volume 1 (of 2)Doran, Dr. (John)
History
Lives of the Queens of England of the House of Hanover, volume 1 (of 2)
Doran, Dr. (John)
Hanover, House of; Queens -- Great Britain -- Biography
When such coarseness was common at court, we need not be surprised
that dramatic authors, whose office it is to hold the mirror up to
nature, should have attempted to make some reflection thereon, or to
take license therefrom, and give additional coarseness to the stage.
Walpole’s virtuous indignation was excited at this liberty--a liberty
taken only because people in his station, and far above his station,
by their vices and coarseness, justified the license. It was this
vice, and not the vices of dramatic authors, which first fettered
the drama and established a censorship. The latter was set up, not
because the stage was wicked, but in order that it should not satirise
the wickedness of those in high station. The Queen was exceedingly
delighted to see a gag put upon both Thalia and Melpomene.
The vice was hideous. They who care to stir the offensive mass will
find proof enough of this hideousness in the account given by Lady
Deloraine, the wife of Mr. Windham, of the King’s courtship of her, and
his consequent temporary oblivion of Madame Walmoden. This new rival of
the Queen, a charming doll of thirty-five years of age, was wooed by
the King in a strain which the stage would hardly have reproduced; and
his suit was commented upon by the lady, in common conversation with
lords and ladies, with an unctuousness of phrase, a licentiousness of
manner, and a coolness of calculation such as would have disgraced the
most immodest of women. This coarseness of sentiment and expression
was equally common. When it was said that Lord Carteret was writing a
history of his times, and that noble author himself alleged that he
was engaged in ‘giving fame to the Queen,’ the latter, one morning,
noticed the alleged fact to Lord Hervey. The King was present, and his
Majesty remarked:--‘I dare say he will paint you in fine colours, the
dirty liar.’ ‘Why not?’ asked Caroline; ‘good things come out of dirt
sometimes. I have ate very good asparagus raised out of dung?’ When
it was said that not only Lord Carteret, but that Lords Bolingbroke
and Chesterfield were also engaged in writing the history of their
times, the Queen critically anticipated ‘that all the three histories
would be three heaps of lies; but lies of very different kinds: she
said Bolingbroke’s would be great lies; Chesterfield’s little lies;
and Carteret’s lies of both sorts.’[31] It may be added, that where
there were vice and coarseness there was little respect for justice
or for independence of conduct. The placeman who voted according to
his conscience, when he found his conscience in antagonism against the
court, was invariably removed from his place.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account