Living Fountains or Broken Cisterns: An Educational Problem for ProtestantsSutherland, E. A. (Edward Alexander)
Religion
Living Fountains or Broken Cisterns: An Educational Problem for Protestants
Sutherland, E. A. (Edward Alexander)
Church and education; Education -- History; Religious education
The Strasburg gymnasium at one time numbered several thousand pupils
representing Denmark, Poland, Portugal, France, and England. “Sturm’s
influence extended to _England, and thence to America_.” An English
writer says: “No one who is acquainted with the education given at our
principal classical schools, _Eaton_, _Winchester_, and _Westminster_,
forty years ago, can fail to see that their curriculum was framed in a
great degree on Sturm’s model.”[137] And yet it is acknowledged that his
“scheme involves a _vast anachronism_.”
[Sidenote: Modern schools follow Sturm]
To show that Sturm is the father of much of the instruction now given
in our high schools and universities, Rosenkranz says: “John Sturm, of
Strasburg, long before Comenius, had laid the foundation of what has
become the _traditional course of instruction and methods of study in the
classical schools for preparation for college_.”[138]
[Sidenote: Reaction as seen in discipline]
The decline in the matter of instruction was accompanied by a
corresponding retrogression in the morals of university students. Painter
tells us that “the state of morals at the universities of the sixteenth
and seventeenth centuries was very low. Idleness, drunkenness, disorder,
and licentiousness prevailed in an unparalleled degree. The practice
of _hazing_ was universal, and new students were subjected to shocking
indignities.” Duke Albrecht, of the university of Jena, wrote in 1624:
“‘Customs before unheard of, inexcusable, unreasonable, and wholly
barbarian, have come into existence.’” Then he speaks of the insulting
names, the expensive suppers, and the carousing of the students, until
“‘parents in distant places either determine not to send their children
to this university, ... or to take them away again.’”[139]
PROTESTANTISM LOST MUCH BECAUSE SHE CEASED TO EDUCATE HER CHILDREN. Had
Protestantism remained true to her first principles of education, her
overthrow would have been impossible. She paved the way for her own fall
by departing gradually from the gospel, and by leaning more and more
toward the classics and scholasticism.
[Sidenote: Ignatius Loyola solves the problem]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account