Living Fountains or Broken Cisterns: An Educational Problem for ProtestantsSutherland, E. A. (Edward Alexander)
Religion
Living Fountains or Broken Cisterns: An Educational Problem for Protestants
Sutherland, E. A. (Edward Alexander)
Church and education; Education -- History; Religious education
The world had for a century been bound by the study of the classics. This
bondage was broken by the Reformation, but the world returned thither
again. Milton, the poet of the seventeenth century, wrote: “Language is
but the _instrument_ conveying to us things useful to be known. Though a
linguist should pride himself to have all the tongues that Babel cleft
the world into, yet if he have not studied the solid things in them, as
well as the words and lexicons, he were nothing so much to be esteemed
a learned man as any yeoman or tradesman competently wise in his mother
dialect only.... We do amiss to spend seven or eight years in scraping
together so much Latin and Greek as might be learned otherwise easily and
delightfully in one year.”[172]
[Sidenote: Things studied instead of language]
Ratich, a German educator of the sixteenth century, said: “We are
in bondage to Latin. The Greeks and Saracens would never have done
so much for posterity if they had spent their youth in acquiring a
foreign tongue. We must study our own language, and then the sciences.”
“Everything first in the mother tongue,” and “nothing on mere
authority,” were rules in his schoolroom. Comenius, the renowned teacher,
used to say: “If so much time is to be spent on the language alone, when
is the boy to know about things,—when will he learn philosophy, when
religion, and so forth? He will consume his life in preparing for life.”
[Sidenote: Mechanical teaching is papal]
How exactly this applies to the word-study of our boys and girls to-day!
It matters not whether it be Latin or English grammar; indeed, it may
be that other mode of expression,—some form of mathematics,—where time
and energy are devoted to the process merely. A failure to make the
development of thought—independent thinking, in fact—the main object in
instruction, stamps any method of teaching as papal, no matter by what
name it is known, or by whom the subjects are taught. It was the life
work of Comenius to counteract this tendency, as the following principles
show. He insisted that “nothing should be taught that is not of solid
utility.” “Nothing is to be learned by heart that is not first thoroughly
understood.” “Theologians and physicians should study Greek.” “Doing can
be learned only by doing.” That educational reformers of to-day are
advocating these same principles will be seen later. This is a part of
Christian education.
[Sidenote: Character-building the aim in true education]
John Locke, an English educator of the seventeenth century, had truth on
the subject of education. Of the languages, he says: “When I consider
what ado is made about a little Latin and Greek, how many years are
spent in it, and what a noise and business it makes to no purpose, I
can hardly forbear thinking that parents of children still live in fear
of the schoolmaster’s rod, which they look on as the only instrument of
education; as if a language or two were its whole business.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account