Living Fountains or Broken Cisterns: An Educational Problem for ProtestantsSutherland, E. A. (Edward Alexander)
Religion
Living Fountains or Broken Cisterns: An Educational Problem for Protestants
Sutherland, E. A. (Edward Alexander)
Church and education; Education -- History; Religious education
This secular method of investigation saps the spiritual life, and
is responsible for the decline in modern Protestantism. Mr. Harris
continues: “Religious education, it is obvious in giving the highest
results of thought and life to the young, must cling to the form of
authority, and not attempt to borrow the methods of mathematics,
science, and history from the secular school. Such borrowing will result
only in giving the young people an overweening confidence in the
finality of their own immature judgments. They will become conceited
and shallow-minded.... Against this danger of sapping or undermining
all authority in religion by the introduction of the methods of the
secular school which lay stress on the self-activity of the child, the
Sunday-school has not been sufficiently protected in the more recent
years of its history.”
If the adoption of secular methods of teaching in the Sunday-school,
where children are instructed one day only in the week, has so weakened
Protestantism, what must be the result when children are daily taught in
the public schools by methods which tend always to exalt human reason
above faith. It is little wonder that five days’ instruction can not be
counteracted by the very best Sabbath instruction even in those schools
which have not adopted secular methods in teaching the Bible.
Protestants should learn from this that in starting Christian schools the
methods followed in the secular schools can not be adopted. Here is the
stumbling-block over which many are apt to fall. Religious instruction
demands methods of teaching which will develop faith.
[Sidenote: Religion in schools of Comenius]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account