Living Fountains or Broken Cisterns: An Educational Problem for ProtestantsSutherland, E. A. (Edward Alexander)
Religion
Living Fountains or Broken Cisterns: An Educational Problem for Protestants
Sutherland, E. A. (Edward Alexander)
Church and education; Education -- History; Religious education
We have seen the origin of two of the streams which, uniting, helped
swell the torrent of the papacy. There are still other tributaries to
this mighty river. Each rises somewhere in heathendom, flows with
a devious course, but finally, as if in accordance with some great
natural law, unites with those other currents in forming the mystery of
iniquity. Each stream is an educational principle, opposed in itself
to Christianity; but instead of being lost in the depths of the main
channel, it seems to develop greater power of doing evil, and brings its
adherents into more complete degradation after the mingling than before.
[Sidenote: Mysticism]
The third principle which presents itself for analysis is known as
_mysticism_. Both the teachings of Clement and the scholasticism of
Origen exalted reason above faith. Mysticism was advocated by Origen and
later by Augustine. It is defined as “that faculty of reason, from which
proceeds the health and vigor of the mind, ... an emanation from God into
the human soul, and comprehended in it the principles and elements of
all truth, human and divine.”[80] There is a spark of divinity in every
man. It is the object of Christian education to develop the image of
Christ in the human being; but with the mystics, it was maintained that
“silence, tranquillity, repose, and solitude, accompanied with such acts
of mortification as might tend to extenuate and exhaust the body, were
the means by which the hidden and internal word was excited to produce
its latent virtues and to instruct men in the knowledge of divine things.”
[Sidenote: Education continues to decline]
It is not so much with the doctrine as with the results which were
wrought by the teachings of such doctrine, that we are concerned.
From an adherence to this method of reasoning arose the whole monkish
system; for, says Mosheim, “This method of reasoning produced strange
effects, and drove many into caves and deserts, where they macerated
their bodies with hunger and thirst, and submitted to all the miseries
of the severest discipline that a gloomy imagination could prescribe.”
Egypt soon swarmed with these fanatics, and the whole history of the
Dark Ages circles around them. They broke the bonds of family affection,
overturned governments, and seated popes. Draper, speaking of the monks,
says: “It is said that there were at one time in that country [Egypt] of
these religious recluses not fewer than seventy-six thousand males and
twenty-seven thousand females. With countless other uncouth forms, under
the hot sun of that climate they seemed to be spawned from the mud of
the Nile.” “From Egypt and Syria monachism spread like an epidemic.” “It
was significantly observed that the road to ecclesiastical elevation lay
through the monastery porch, and often _ambition contentedly wore for a
season the cowl, that it might seize more surely the miter_.”[81]
[Sidenote: Monks control schools]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account