Of _The Letters on Toleration_, though deeply interesting to the
generation in which they were written, a very brief account will here
suffice. Their main thesis is, that the jurisdiction of the civil
magistrate does not extend to the regulation of religious worship or
to controlling the expression of religious beliefs, except so far as
that worship or those beliefs may interfere with the ends of civil
government. The respective provinces of a commonwealth and a church
are strictly defined, and are shown to be perfectly distinct. "The
boundaries on both sides are fixed and immovable. He jumbles heaven
and earth together, the things most remote and opposite, who mixes
these societies, which are in their original, end, business, and in
everything, perfectly distinct and infinitely different from each
other." But it may be asked, are there no speculative opinions, no
tenets, actual or possible, of any religious community which should be
restrained by the Civil Magistrate? The answer is, yes,--
"First, No opinions contrary to human society, or to those moral
rules which are necessary to the preservation of civil society, are
to be tolerated by the magistrate."
Secondly, after speaking of those who maintain such positions as that
"faith is not to be kept with heretics," that "kings excommunicated
forfeit their crowns and kingdoms," that "dominion is founded in
grace," he proceeds:
"These, therefore, and the like, who attribute unto the faithful,
religious, and orthodox, that is, in plain terms, unto themselves,
any peculiar privilege or power above other mortals in civil
concernments, or who, upon pretence of religion, do challenge any
manner of authority over such as are not associated with them in
their ecclesiastical communion: I say these have no right to be
tolerated by the magistrate, as neither those that will not own and
teach the duty of tolerating all men in matters of mere religion. For
what do all these and the like doctrines signify, but that they may,
and are ready upon any occasion to seize the government, and possess
themselves of the estates and fortunes of their fellow-subjects, and
that they only ask leave to be tolerated by the magistrates so long
until they find themselves strong enough to effect it?"
"Thirdly, That church can have no right to be tolerated by the
magistrate, which is constituted upon such a bottom that all those
who enter upon it do thereby ipso facto deliver themselves up to
the protection and service of another prince. For by this means the
magistrate would give way to the settling of a foreign jurisdiction
in his own country, and suffer his own people to be listed, as it
were, for soldiers against his own government."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account