I would not imply that our birds are the better songsters, but that
their songs, if briefer and feebler, are also more wild and
plaintive,—in fact, that they are softer-voiced. The British birds, as
I have stated, are more domestic than ours; a much larger number build
about houses and towers and outbuildings. The titmouse with us is
exclusively a wood-bird; but in Britain three or four species of them
resort more or less to buildings in winter. Their redstart also builds
under the eaves of houses; their starling in church steeples and in
holes in walls; several thrushes resort to sheds to nest; and jackdaws
breed in the crannies of the old architecture, and this in a much
milder climate than our own.
They have in that country no birds that answer to our tiny, lisping
wood-warblers,—genus _Dendroica,_—nor to our vireos, _Vireonidœ._ On
the other hand, they have a larger number of field-birds and
semi-game-birds. They have several species like our robin; thrushes
like him, and some of them larger, as the ring ouzel, the
missel-thrush, the fieldfare, the throstle, the redwing, White’s
thrush, the blackbird,—these, besides several species in size and
habits more like our wood thrush.
Several species of European birds sing at night besides the true
nightingale,—not fitfully and as if in their dreams, as do a few of our
birds, but continuously. They make a business of it. The sedge-bird
ceases at times as if from very weariness; but wake the bird up, says
White, by throwing a stick or stone into the bushes, and away it goes
again in full song. We have but one real nocturnal songster, and that
is the mockingbird. One can see how this habit might increase among the
birds of a long-settled country like England. With sounds and voices
about them, why should they be silent, too? The danger of betraying
themselves to their natural enemies would be less than in our woods.
That their birds are more quarrelsome and pugnacious than ours I think
evident. Our thrushes are especially mild-mannered, but the
missel-thrush is very bold and saucy, and has been known to fly in the
face of persons who have disturbed the sitting bird. No jay nor magpie
nor crow can stand before him. The Welsh call him master of the
coppice, and he welcomes a storm with such a vigorous and hearty song
that in some countries he is known as storm-cock. He sometimes kills
the young of other birds and eats eggs,—a very unthrushlike trait. The
whitethroat sings with crest erect, and attitudes of warning and
defiance. The hooper is a great bully; so is the greenfinch. The
wood-grouse—now extinct, I believe—has been known to attack people in
the woods. And behold the grit and hardihood of that little emigrant or
exile to our shores, the English sparrow! Our birds have their tilts
and spats also; but the only really quarrelsome members in our family
are confined to the flycatchers, as the kingbird and the great crested
flycatcher. None of our song-birds are bullies.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account