68. How do you distinguish between what Mill calls the Geometrical,
Physical, and Historical Methods?
68A. The Comparative Method is appealed to where direct evidence is
wanting. Explain this.
69. What is meant by a doctrine being unverifiable? If a conclusion
reached by deduction does not agree with the facts, where must we look
for error?
70. There are certain cases in which failure of verification is fatal to
a theory, and other cases in which it is of comparatively little
cogency. How would you distinguish between these classes of cases? [S]
71. Taking the "evolution," or any other proposed hypothesis, how should
one proceed (a) to show whether it satisfies the conditions of a
legitimate hypothesis sufficiently to entitle it to investigation, and
(b) to test it with a view to its acceptance or rejection as a truth of
science? [S]
72. What do you mean by saying that "a phenomenon has been
satisfactorily explained"?
73. Explain and illustrate the Historical Method of Sociological
inquiry. [S]
74. What is the relation of the theory of Probability to Logic? [S]
75. Explain and discuss the doctrine that Induction is based upon the
Theory of Probability. [S]
75A. What are the logical grounds of the Law of Error?
76. Explain the nature and use of Classification, the means to, and
tests of, its successful performance. [S]
77. What is Definition and what is its use? Mention various difficulties
that occur in the process, and show how they are to be met. [S]
78. Propose rules for a good Division and a good Definition, and
exemplify the breach of them. [S]
79. Examine the validity of the idea of Real Kinds. [O]
80. What kind of words are indefinable, and why? When do we define by
negation and by example? [S]
81. Distinguish between the province and aims of classification and
(logical) division. Illustrate. [S]
82. What is an _infima species_ or _species specialissima_? Compare the
use of the terms _genus_ and _species_ in Logic with that which is
common in speaking of animals or plants. [S]
83. How far does the formation of Definitions and Classifications
constitute the end of Science? [S]
84. Examine the methodological relations between Definition,
Classification and Nomenclature. [S]
85. Give instances of "Differentia," "Property," "Inseparable Accident";
and examine, with reference to your instances, how far it is possible to
distinguish them. [S]
V. MISCELLANEOUS.
86. "People can reason without the help of Logic." Why is this not a
sufficient objection to the study? In your answer show distinctly why
Logic should be studied. [S]
87. What is the meaning of the assertion that Logic is concerned with
the form, and not with the matter, of thought? [S]
88. "Neither by deductive nor inductive reasoning can we add a tittle to
our implicit knowledge." (Jevons.) Explain and criticise. [S]
89. What is the logical foundation of the indirect method or _reductio
ad absurdum_? Is it applicable to non-mathematical subjects? [S]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account