Londinium, Architecture and the CraftsLethaby, W. R. (William Richard)
History
Londinium, Architecture and the Crafts
Lethaby, W. R. (William Richard)
England -- Antiquities, Roman; London (England) -- Antiquities, Roman; Romans -- England -- London
“Now, besides red pots,” says Conyers, “such as have inscriptions in the
bottoms [_i.e._ Samian], there were black pots with inscriptions and
part of white earth and the glazing black, and both these might be made
in ye places, as well as a gilded sort of earthenware. There was a
brownish sort inclining to yellow, and the gilding easily coming off.
Now, whether this was a thin wash of gold colour or foliated, I know
not, yet I think foliated [really mica]. Other pots and urns of a
whitish yellow and a soft kind of earth and shells strewed at the bottom
inside. Now, other pots as thin as glass with raised work, and these as
of a silvered or bell-metal coloured glazing. The imagery, hounds,
hares, stags, thorns, trees and branching, flourishings—all raised work.
Then I have lamps of gilded British-work [local] and coarse
whitish-yellow colours, and bottles and pots for dropping, of the same
colours.” In one of his repetitions, Conyers mentions “great potsherds
and ears of six-gallon pots.” He also gives sketches of many of the
vessels. Doubtless those drawn were in most cases whole vessels and they
are of the coarser wares, other than Samian. It is probable, therefore,
that they were pottery made on the spot. Dr. Harwood, describing the
excavations in the site of St. Mary Woolnoth in 1724, says that “Roman
foundations were found made of offal of brick kilns and furnaces” (_Soc.
Antiq. Minutes_).
It would be an easy thing to identify in our collections vessels which
conform to the types sketched by Conyers and then to form a group of
actual pots which presumably were made in London. This coarse and
ordinary ware is usually classed as “Roman,” but it was in a large
degree a Celtic inheritance. The black wares of “carinated” profile
(Figs. 135 and 136) and more or less “cordonned” decorations are very
like Marne pottery of the Celtic period. It seems quite likely that the
potteries of Londinium may have existed before the Roman Conquest.
[Illustration:
FIG. 135.
]
[Illustration:
FIG. 136.
]
[Illustration:
FIG. 137.
]
Many of the decorated pots in our museums are so clearly described by
Conyers that they, too, can be identified. It is evident, for instance,
that Castor-ware vessels with hunting scenes in slip were as well
represented in the finds as they are in our museums to-day. Hunting
itself must have been much in the people’s minds, with chariot races and
the gladiator “matches.”
[Illustration:
FIG. 138.
]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account