London and Its Environs Described, vol. 4 (of 6): Containing an Account of Whatever is Most Remarkable for Grandeur, Elegance, Curiosity or Use, in the City and in the Country Twenty Miles Round ItAnonymous
History
London and Its Environs Described, vol. 4 (of 6): Containing an Account of Whatever is Most Remarkable for Grandeur, Elegance, Curiosity or Use, in the City and in the Country Twenty Miles Round It
Anonymous
London (England) -- Description and travel -- Early works to 1800; London (England) -- Gazetteers -- Early works to 1800
However, it was ordered by act of Parliament, that many of the streets
and lanes should be widened, and the city was impowered to make a new
street from Cheapside to Guildhall, which obtained the name of King
street, and another from Threadneedle street to Lothbury, called
Prince’s street. And the markets, which till then were held in Newgate
street and Cheapside, were ordered to be removed behind the houses into
commodious market places to be prepared for that purpose. It was also
enacted that all the houses should be built with stone or brick, with
party walls, and the whole finished within three years: that the ground
in several places should be raised, and that a column of brass or stone
should be erected on or near the place where the above dreadful fire
began; whence arose that noble column called the Monument: but had it
been raised near the place where the fire ceased, and in the center of
the fine circular area proposed by Sir Christopher Wren, in Fleet
street, where eight streets would radiate upon it, and where it would be
seen to terminate the view, even from Aldgate and Westminster, it would
have enjoyed a situation vastly more worthy of its beauty, and have
appeared to infinitely greater advantage, than in the corner where it is
now placed. See the article MONUMENT.
The reader has just seen the city under two of the most dreadful
calamities that could fall upon a people, pestilence, and a general
destruction by fire; he will now see the citizens suffering calamities
of a very different kind, and deprived of all their boasted privileges.
This affair it is necessary to trace from its origin.
In the beginning of May 1679, a conspiracy of the papists was
discovered, for destroying the city again by fire, occasioned by the
burning of one Bird’s house in Fetter lane; for Elizabeth Oxley, the
servant, being suspected, was committed to prison; where she not only
confessed the fact, but declared, that she was prevailed upon to fire it
by one Stubbs, a papist, upon the promise of 5l. Stubbs being secured,
confessed that he had been excited to this by Father Gifford, his
confessor, who told him, that instead of its being a sin, it would be a
great service to the church to burn and destroy all the houses of
heretics; and that he had several conferences with Gifford, and two
Irishmen, upon that affair; that an insurrection was to be made in
London, and a powerful army expected from France. Five Jesuits were
executed for this plot, the papists banished from the city, and ten
miles round, and afterwards the Lord Stafford was beheaded for the same
crime.
In revenge, the Romish party trumped up what was called the Meal Tub
plot, to bring an odium upon the presbyterians and the heads of the
country party; but Dangerfield, the chief actor in this farce, being
committed to prison, applied himself to the Lord Mayor, and in an ample
confession laid open the whole scene of iniquity, discovering the
persons who set him to work.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account