London and Its Environs Described, vol. 4 (of 6): Containing an Account of Whatever is Most Remarkable for Grandeur, Elegance, Curiosity or Use, in the City and in the Country Twenty Miles Round ItAnonymous
History
London and Its Environs Described, vol. 4 (of 6): Containing an Account of Whatever is Most Remarkable for Grandeur, Elegance, Curiosity or Use, in the City and in the Country Twenty Miles Round It
Anonymous
London (England) -- Description and travel -- Early works to 1800; London (England) -- Gazetteers -- Early works to 1800
This wall, which is by some supposed to have been built by Constantine
the Great, and by others by his mother Helena, was probably not erected
till the time of Valentinian I. about the year 368. Britain had been
reduced to very great misery, by the joint attacks of the Scots, Picts,
Attacots, Saxons, and Franks; and the Romans, till the arrival of
Theodosius the Elder, were defeated in several engagements: but that
General having routed some parties of the enemy, entered the city of
London in triumph. And we are told by _Am. Marcel, lib. 27._ that
Theodosius, by repairing some cities and castles, and fortifying others,
left every thing in so good a situation, that peace was preserved in
Britain till the departure of the Romans in the reign of the Emperor
Honorius.
Dr. Woodward, in the year 1707, had an opportunity of narrowly observing
its fabrick and composition, by a part of the wall near Bishopsgate
being pulled down, to make way for new buildings; and this learned
antiquary observes, that “From the foundation, which lay eight feet
below the present surface, quite up to the top of the oldest part, which
was in all near ten feet, it was compiled alternately of layers of broad
flat bricks and rag-stones. The bricks lay in double ranges, and each
brick being but one inch and three tenths in thickness, the whole layer,
with the mortar, exceeded not three inches. The layers of stone were not
two feet thick of our measure. It is probable they were intended for two
of the Roman, their rule being somewhat shorter than ours. To this
height the workmanship was after the Roman manner, and these were the
remains of the ancient wall. In this it was very observable, that the
mortar was so very firm and hard, that the stone itself as easily broke.
It was thus far, from the foundation upwards, nine feet in thickness.
The above broad thin bricks were all of Roman make, and of the very sort
we learn from Pliny, that were in common use among the Romans. Measuring
some of these (says Mr. Woodward) I found them seventeen inches and four
tenths in thickness, and eleven inches and six tenths in breadth.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account