[456] Repertory 184, fos. 204-207. [457] Repertory 184, fo. 207. [458] _Id._, fo. 209. [459] Journal 68, fos. 65, 65b. [460] Repertory 184, fo. 210. [461] The king to Lord North, 6 June, 1780.--Correspondence ii, 324. [462] Journal 68, fo. 65b. [463] Journal 68, fo. 66. Notwithstanding these precautions--and it is difficult to see what more could be done--Walpole declares that "the Lord Mayor Kennet and Sheriff Pughe behaved shamefully."--Journal ii, 408. [464] This incident is depicted in a well known engraving, where the Mayor is represented, with his hat off, giving the command to fire. A prominent figure in the group is the surgeon, Sir William Blizard, tending a wounded man, whilst an attempt is being made on his own life by one of the rioters.--See Raikes's History of the Hon. Artillery Company ii, 68. [465] Repertory 184, fo. 246; Walpole, Journal ii, 407-409; Walpole to the Countess of Ossory, 7 June, 1780.--Letters vii, 386-389. [466] Annual Register xxiii, 262. [467] Journal 68, fo. 67. Walpole, Journal ii, 409, 410. [468] Repertory 184, fos. 228-236. [469] _Id._, fo. 232. According to the Gentleman's Magazine (Vol. 50, p. 295) it would appear that the mayor was put on his defence for we read: "The lord mayor of London was summoned before the privy council; but discharged the same evening." A modern writer goes so far as to say "the lord mayor was tried and convicted of criminal negligence." (Bright, Hist, of England iii, 1,094). Another goes still further, and states that he was "prosecuted by the attorney general for a gross neglect of duty and was convicted, but his death prevented the passing sentence." (See note by editor of Letters of George III to Lord North, ii, 324). As a matter of fact Kennet did not die until two years later, and he continued to perform his civic duties to the last.--Repertory 186, fo. 196. [470] Highmore, Hist, of Hon. Artillery Company, p. 332. On the 16th June, the Court of Aldermen passed a vote of thanks to the association, as well as to the corps of light horse volunteers, serving under Alderman Kirkman, who had been the first to call the attention of the Court of Aldermen to Lord Amherst's orders. (Repertory 184, fos. 251-253.) The Common Council also acknowledged the services of both bodies, by resolving to present the first mentioned corps with a handsome pair of colours, and the second with a pair of standards.--Journal 68, fos. 72b-73. [471] Repertory 184, fos. 243-248. [472] Repertory 184, fos. 249-250. [473] _Id._, fos. 254-256. [474] Repertory 184, fo. 267. [475] Journal House of Lords, xxxvi, 151. [476] Repertory 184, fo. 270. [477] Journal House of Commons, xxxvii, 929. [478] Repertory 184, fos. 309-312. [479] Hansard, Parliamentary History xxi, 701, 702; Walpole, Journal ii, 418. [480] Journal 68, fo. 338. The entry is misplaced. [481] _Id._, fos. 70, 74b. [482] _Id._, fos. 71, 77b-78. [483] _Id._, fos. 159b, 196b, 296. Journal 69, fo. 257b.