London Days: A Book of ReminiscencesWarren, Arthur
History
London Days: A Book of Reminiscences
Warren, Arthur
London (England) -- Intellectual life; London (England) -- Social life and customs
Those first nights with the first favourites dissolved my American
notions of the British character. I had heard, with the rest of the
outer world, that the British were stolid, phlegmatic, cold, and what
not, {197} that they repressed their emotions, that they would not and
could not let themselves go. I was to find what everybody finds,
sooner or later,--that the individual and the mass differ as chalk from
cheese. The pit crowds were not icebergs; they had not the immobility
of mountains. They laughed, they wept, they cheered; they unlocked
their emotions. They were the most sentimental, the most enthusiastic,
the most appreciative crowds I had ever seen. The individual was
dissolved in the mass. He became natural man. The crowds always took
fire from a spark. They received their favourites as if they were
conquering heroes. Irving, their greatest favourite, they received
like a reigning monarch. One has to learn this about the British;
their hearts are big and near their skins, and that is why, as
individuals, they armour them.
If you know how to touch them, they respond with such demonstrations of
devotion, of enthusiasm, of loyalty, as no other race ever equals in
our time. Their loyalty to Irving they expressed with a zeal that was
greater even than their appreciation of his powers, immense as that
appreciation was. They loved the man. He embodied for them another
lofty mark in the records of English achievement. He was great and
would be greater by the integrity, the persistence, the elevation of
his purpose. Such qualities win the English, and deep is the loyalty
with which England rewards them. That, at all events, was true in the
Victorian days.
There was a blessed vision called Ellen Terry, in those far-away Lyceum
nights. Her power was {198} charm. And she wielded her power almost
to the end of King Henry's reign. In comedy she was alluring,
audacious, delightful,--as Portia, for instance; as Beatrice; as any
number of arch, graceful, incomparable creatures. In tragedy,--well,
we forgave her the tragedies, her Lady Macbeth, for example. As
Ophelia there was nothing to forgive; as Juliet--here was the exception
to her tragic parts; she was a poet's dream, a fragile, loving, playful
thing enmeshed by fate and borne down to death. Ellen Terry was the
witching consort of Irving's reign. She won half his battle. "A star
danced, and under that" she "was born." When Father Time told her that
she could not play Portia and Beatrice and Juliet any more, half the
attractiveness of the Lyceum was gone, and Irving had to carry the load
alone.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account