London Days: A Book of ReminiscencesWarren, Arthur
History
London Days: A Book of Reminiscences
Warren, Arthur
London (England) -- Intellectual life; London (England) -- Social life and customs
"Your article said that an action for divorce had been entered by a
Captain O'Shea who named Parnell as corespondent."
"Well, what of it? Everybody knows it."
"I don't know it. We don't know it here. Nobody knows it."
"And you 're an editor, Jeffrey! Is that the way you keep the run of
the news?"
"Such a case has never been tried."
"It has not _yet_ been tried, you mean. Of course not; it has to take
its turn. It will come on in the autumn."
"Who is O'Shea?"
I stared at Roche in amazement. And then I laughed.
"Jeffrey," said I, "you do it very well."
"Do what? No," said he, "it is n't acting. Who is he?"
I told him, and added that the question had been put differently by the
Irish members of Parliament a long time ago. They asked at one
time--"Why is he?" After a while they asked nothing.
"And your article said that the Irish party would turn against Parnell
if the case were tried, and that the English Liberals would throw him
over, and the Home Rule cause would go to pieces."
{249}
"Pardon me, Jeffrey, my article said that those would be some of the
results if O'Shea won his case, not if the case were tried."
"Gladstone would n't turn against Parnell!"
"Jeffrey, if that's all you know about the Irish Question, take my
advice and return to Ireland by the next ship and study it on the spot.
Then go to Westminster and study it there. Learn what the Unionists
think, what Liberals think, and what Mr. Gladstone, as leader of the
Liberal Party, has to think, and--"
"It's another Piggott trick! Parnell's defence will show it all up."
"Suppose he should n't defend himself?"
"That's unfair!"
"Let me tell you a thing or two. Make a note of 'em, and see what
happens within a year!"
In the course of the next two hours Roche heard more of the inside of
Irish and English politics than I would have supposed could previously
have escaped an editor's mind. It was clear that the comings and
goings of Irish parliamentarians bent on propaganda and money-raising
had not left behind much information that could guide a distant editor
over a course abounding with obstacles. My experience with Roche that
evening resembled all the experiences I have ever had in the United
States when talking on the Irish question with persons who seemed
really anxious for information. And the situation is much the same at
this hour, differing only in kind, not in degree.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account