London in the Jacobite times, Volume IIDoran, Dr. (John)
History
London in the Jacobite times, Volume II
Doran, Dr. (John)
London (England) -- History -- 18th century
Lord Cromartie’s reply could only be heard by those who sat near him,
as he read it with a low and tremulous voice. They who heard it are
said to have preferred it to Kilmarnock’s address――an opinion in which
they who now read both will not concur. Cromartie expressed sorrow
at having drawn his eldest son (who was captured with him) into the
rebellion, and while he hoped for mercy, professed to be resigned to
God’s will, if mercy were denied him; but the substance of his reply
was that he had never thought of rebelling till there was a rebellion!
Walpole has put on record that if Lord Cromartie had pleaded ‘_Not
Guilty_,’ there was ready to be produced against him a paper, signed
with his own hand, for putting the English prisoners to death. The best
proof that the statement is unfounded is the fact that Cromartie was
ultimately pardoned.
[Sidenote: _BALMERINO’S DEFENCE._]
Last came bold Balmerino. He had little to say, but it was to the
purpose. Before the three lords left the Tower, that morning, a good
friend had sent them a suggestion, in the form of a plea which, if
successfully made, would not only save the lives of the lords, but
stop the further execution of the Jacobites at Kennington. The plea
was,――that as the Act for regulating the trials of these lords did not
take place till after their crime was committed, judgment ought not
to be pronounced. The plea had been handed to the Lieutenant of the
Tower, who had made it over to the Governor, the Earl of Cornwallis,
by whom it was laid before the Lords sitting in Westminster Hall, who
‘tenderly and rightly,’ says Walpole, sent it to the Jacobite peers
awaiting judgment. Balmerino alone made use of it, and he demanded
counsel to assist him in establishing it. ‘The High Steward,’ almost in
a passion, told him that when he had been offered counsel he did not
accept it! After some discussion, Messrs. Forester and Wilbraham were
named as counsel, and as they needed time to consider the question, the
Court adjourned to Friday, August 1st, on which day Balmerino’s counsel
confessed that the plea was invalid, and simply apologised for having
wasted their lordships’ time, and Lord Hardwicke, after a tedious
speech, pronounced sentence. The worst point in the Lord High Steward’s
speech was in a taunting expression of surprise at the two earls, who,
with so much loyal feeling as they pretended to possess, had gone into
rebellion. ‘Your lordships,’ he remarked, ‘have left that a blank in
your apologies,’ a course, he added, which might be safely left to the
construction of others.
[Sidenote: _BALMERINO’S CONDUCT._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account