London in the Jacobite times, Volume IIDoran, Dr. (John)
History
London in the Jacobite times, Volume II
Doran, Dr. (John)
London (England) -- History -- 18th century
a crime which, according to military men, made him infamous for ever.
The pardon lost some of its grace from the fact that it was granted
simply to engage the vote of Balmerino’s brother at the election of
Scotch Peers! The deserter at Sheriff-Muir took up arms against the
side that had pardoned his desertion. Like Lord Kilmarnock, he pleaded
the pressure of poverty.
[Illustration; Decorative Banner]
CHAPTER X.
(1746.)
[Illustration: Drop-B]etween condemnation and execution, Drury Lane, as
if London had not had enough of trials and judgments, got up a showy
spectacle, in one act, partly obtained from Shakespeare’s ‘Henry V.,’
called ‘The Conspiracy Discovered, or French Policy Defeated,’ with
‘a representation of the Trial of the Lords for High Treason, in the
reign of Henry V.’ This was first acted on the 5th of August. But the
populace knew where to find a ‘spectacle, gratis.’
Gazing at the heads above Temple Bar became a pastime. Pickpockets
circulated among the well-dressed crowd, reaping rich harvest; but,
when detected, they were dragged down to the adjacent river, and
mercilessly ‘ducked,’ which was barely short of being drowned. A head,
called ‘Layer’s,’ had been there for nearly a quarter of a century.
An amiable creature, in a letter to a newspaper, thus refers to it,
in connection with those recently spiked there:――‘Thursday, August
7.――Councillor Layer’s head on Temple Bar appears to be making a
reverend Bow to the heads of Towneley and Fletcher, supposing they
are come to relieve him after his long Look-out, but as he is under a
mistake, I think it would be proper to put him to Rights again, which
may be done by your means.――_An Abhorrer of Rebellion._’
[Sidenote: _THE DUKE AT VAUXHALL._]
About this time Walpole offers, with questionable alacrity, evidence
against the character of the Duke of Cumberland. The duke had fixed an
evening for giving a ball at Vauxhall, in honour of a not too reputable
Peggy Banks. The evening proved to be that of the day on which the
lords were condemned to death, the 1st of August. The duke immediately
postponed the ball, but Walpole says he was ‘_persuaded_ to defer it,
as it would have looked like an insult to the prisoners.’ After all,
the unseemly festivity was only deferred from the 1st of August to the
4th; and Walpole was one of the company. He saw the royalties embark at
Whitehall Stairs, heard the National Anthem played and sung on board
state city-barges; and saw the duke nearly suffocated by the crowds
that greeted him on his landing at Vauxhall. He was got safely ashore,
not being helped by the awkward officiousness of Lord Cathcart who, a
few evenings previously, at the same place, stepping on the side of
the boat to lend his arm to the duke, upset it; and the conqueror at
Culloden and my lord were soused into the Thames up to their chins.
[Sidenote: _OPINION IN THE CITY._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account