London in the Jacobite times, Volume IIDoran, Dr. (John)
History
London in the Jacobite times, Volume II
Doran, Dr. (John)
London (England) -- History -- 18th century
pitifully alluded to his having to rise by 4 o’clock, in order to be
at Westminster by 9. He spoke of his frequent fainting fits; he often
asked leave to retire, and, in short, he so exasperated the Lord High
Steward as to make that official grow peevish, and to wrathfully advise
Lord Lovat to keep _his_ temper. When the Attorney-General called his
first witness, Chevis of Murtoun, the lawyer described him, with solemn
facetiousness, as being as near a neighbour as man could be to Lovat,
but as far apart from him as was possible in thought and action. Lovat
protested against the legal competency of the witness, he being Lovat’s
tenant and vassal. Hours were spent over this objection, and the old
lord wearied the clerk, whom he called upon to read ancient Acts of
Parliament, from beginning to end. The protest was disallowed; and the
witness having been asked if he owed Lovat money, and if a verdict of
guilty might help him not to pay it, emphatically declared that he owed
Lovat nothing. He then went into a long array of evidence, sufficient
to have beheaded Lovat many times over, as a traitor to the reigning
family, and indeed no faithful servant of the family desiring to reign.
The traitor himself laughed when this witness quoted a ballad in
English, which Lovat had composed, ‘in Erse’:――
When young Charley does come over,
There will be blows and blood good store.
‘When,’ said the witness, ‘I refused a commission offered me by the
Pretender, Lord Lovat told me I was guilty of High Treason.’ Further,
Lovat had drunk ‘Confusion to the White Horse and the whole generation
of them;’ and had cursed both the Reformation and the Revolution. Lovat
retorted by showing that this not disinterested witness was a loyal man
living at the expense of Government. ‘He is trying to hang an old man
to save himself,’ said Lovat. This was warmly denied, but Lovat was
right in the implication.
[Sidenote: _FATHER AND SON._]
Lovat’s secretary, Fraser, was a dangerous witness. He proved that, by
Lord Lovat’s order, he, the secretary, wrote to Lord Loudon (in the
service of George II.) informing him that he was unable to keep his son
out of the rebellion, and another letter to the Pretender that, though
unable to go himself to help to restore the Stuarts, he had sent his
eldest son to their standard. It was shown that the son was disgusted
at his father’s double-dealing, and only yielded to him at last (in
joining the army of Charles Edward), on the ground that he was bound
to obey his sire and the chief of the clan Fraser. Undoubtedly, the
attempt to save himself by the sacrificing of his son, was the blackest
spot in Lovat’s mean, black, and cruel character. According to Walpole,
‘he told’ Williamson, the Lieutenant of the Tower, ‘We will hang my
eldest son and then my second shall marry your niece!’
[Sidenote: _THE FRASERS._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account