London in the Jacobite times, Volume IIDoran, Dr. (John)
History
London in the Jacobite times, Volume II
Doran, Dr. (John)
London (England) -- History -- 18th century
The most important witness of all was, of course, Mr. Murray, of
Boughton, late secretary to the young Chevalier, and, only a day or
two before, a prisoner in the King’s Bench, from which he had been
discharged. In the course of his answers, Murray said he had been
‘directed’ to give a narrative of the springs and progress of the late
rebellion,――when he came to be examined at the Bar of the High Court
of Justice, where he was then standing. ‘Directed?’ exclaimed the Earl
of Cholmondely, ‘who _directed_ you?’ The Lord High Steward and the
Earl of Chesterfield protested they had not heard the word ‘directed’
used by the witness. There was a wish to have the matter cleared up,
and Murray then said, ‘Some days after my examination in the Tower, by
the honourable Committee of the House of Commons, a gentleman, who, I
believe was their secretary, came to me to take a further examination;
and to ask me as to any other matter that had occurred since my last
examination. Some days after that, he told me I should be called here
before your Lordships, upon the trial of my Lord Lovat, and that at the
same time, it would be _expected_ that I should give an account of the
rise and progress of the Rebellion in general.’
[Sidenote: _MURRAY’S EVIDENCE._]
The above shows pretty clearly how the weak natures of prisoners in
the Tower were dealt with, in order to get evidence by which they
would destroy at once the life of a confederate and their own honour.
Murray did what he was ‘directed’ or ‘expected’ to do, without passion
but with some sense of pain and shame. The whole rise and course of
the insurrection may be found in his testimony; he was prepared for
the questions, equally so with the answers he gave to them; and his
evidence is of importance for a proper understanding of the outbreak.
Some merit was made of his ‘voluntary surrender,’ but Lord Talbot,
quite in Lovat’s interest, roughly asked if Murray had really intended
to surrender himself at the time he became a prisoner to the Royal
forces. The poor man truthfully answered that ‘it was not then my
intention particularly to surrender myself’;――adding, ‘it was not
my intention till I saw the dragoons;’――but that he had never since
attempted to escape.――‘Have you ever taken the Oaths of Allegiance and
Fidelity to the King?’ asked Lord Talbot. He never had. ‘Did you ever
take such Oaths to anybody else?’ ◆[Sidenote: _CROSS EXAMINATION._]◆
Murray let drop a murmured ‘No’; and then Sir William Yonge, one of
the Managers for the Commons, came to his help, with the expression
of a hope that the king’s witness should not be obliged to answer
questions that tended to accuse himself of High Treason. To which Lord
Talbot replied that the gentleman had already confessed himself guilty
of that crime. Lord Talbot then asked Murray if he was a voluntary
evidence. Murray requested him to explain what he meant by those two
words. ‘Are you here?’ said Talbot, ‘in hopes of a pardon? And if you
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account