London in the Jacobite times, Volume IIDoran, Dr. (John)
History
London in the Jacobite times, Volume II
Doran, Dr. (John)
London (England) -- History -- 18th century
Although there was plotting in 1753, and mischief was a-foot, and
Government spies were far from having an idle time of it, the royal
family lived in comparative quiet, save one passing episode connected
with a charge laid, in the month of March, against Bishop Johnson,
of Gloucester, Murray (Solicitor-General), and Stone (one of the
sub-preceptors to the Princes George and Edward)――as Jacobites――of
having had, as Walpole puts it, ‘an odd custom of toasting the
Chevalier and my Lord Dunbar (Murray’s brother and one of the
Chevalier’s peers) at one Vernon’s, a merchant, about twenty years
ago. _The Pretender’s counterpart_ (the King) ordered the Council to
examine into it.’ The accuser, Fawcett, a lawyer, prevaricated. ‘Stone
and Murray,’ says Walpole, ‘took the Bible, on their innocence. Bishop
Johnson scrambled out of the scrape at the very beginning; and the
Council have reported to the King that the accusation was false and
malicious.’
Vernon was in reality a linen-draper. Few people doubted the alleged
drinking of Jacobite healths at his house. The dowager Princess of
Wales told Bubb Dodington that her late husband had told her that Stone
was a Jacobite,――the prince was convinced of it, and when affairs went
ill abroad, he used to say to her in a passion: How could better be
expected when such a Jacobite as Stone could be trusted?
[Sidenote: _THE ROYAL FAMILY._]
Lord Harcourt, Prince George’s governor, was a pedantic man, having
no sympathies with the young. My lord was not much of a Mentor for
a young Telemachus. He bored the prince by enjoining him to hold up
his head, and, ‘for God’s sake,’ to turn out his toes. The tutors of
Prince George, after his father’s death, were in fact divided among
themselves. Bishop Hayter, of Norwich, and Lord Harcourt were openly
at war with Stone and Scott (the last put in by Bolingbroke), who
were countenanced by the dowager princess and Murray, ‘so my Lord
Bolingbroke dead, will govern, which he never could living.’ Murray,
and Stone, and Cresset were Jacobites. Cresset called Lord Harcourt a
groom, and the bishop an atheist. The princess accused the latter of
teaching her sons, George and Edward, nothing. The bishop retorted by
declaring that he was never allowed to teach them anything. His chief
complaint was that Jacobite Stone had lent Prince George (or the Prince
of Wales) a highly Jacobite book to read, namely, ‘The Revolutions of
England,’ by Father D’Orléans; but the objectionable work had really
been lent by ‘Lady Augusta’ to Prince Edward, and by him to his elder
brother.
[Sidenote: _PARLIAMENTARY ANECDOTES._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account