London in the Jacobite times, Volume IIDoran, Dr. (John)
History
London in the Jacobite times, Volume II
Doran, Dr. (John)
London (England) -- History -- 18th century
In another page, one of the actors puts a sensible query, and
adds a silly remark on the present condition of the Stuart
cause:――‘Wonderful!――but why such mystery?――why?――for what should the
birth of an heir to the House of Stuart be thus concealed? It had――it
yet has friends (in Europe), and its interests must ever be identified
with those of France, Spain, and Rome.’ Of this sort of thing,
though there be little, there is more than enough; but the reader,
as he proceeds, has an opportunity of conceiving a high opinion of
Red Eagle’s common sense, and of fully agreeing with him at least in
one observation which is put in the following form: ‘Woman!’ said the
Tolair, ‘this is no time for bombast and juggling!’ The old Admiral
Carter Allen never indulged in either. In his will the gallant sailor
calls John and Thomas Allen his _sons_. He does not call Thomas his
_foster_ son. Prince Charles Edward spoke of no child in _his_ will but
his illegitimate daughter, the Duchess of Albany. The Cardinal of York
took the nominal title of king at his brother’s death; and received
the duchess into his house. At her death, in 1789, the Crown jewels,
which James II. had carried off from England, came into the cardinal’s
possession; and these, at the beginning of the present century, he
generously surrendered to George III. The cardinal was well assured
that no legitimate heir of his brother had ever existed.
[Sidenote: _THE LEVER OF POETRY._]
The assurance that there was one, however, continued to be made, and
that the sons of Tolair were as poetical as they were princely was next
asserted.
[Sidenote: _POETICAL POLITICS._]
In 1848, Mr. Dolman, of London (conjointly with Blackwood), published
a poetical manifestation by the Count, John Sobieski Stuart, and his
brother, Charles Edward. It had an innocent look, but a mysterious
purpose. Its title is, ‘Lays of the Deer Forest.’ The Lays are
dedicated to Louisa Sobieska Stuart, by her father and uncle. The
second volume, consisting of ‘Notes,’ is dedicated to a Charles Edward
Stuart, by _his_ father and uncle. There is something of a poetical
fire in the Lays; and much interesting matter on deer-stalking and
other sporting subjects in the Notes. The spirit is thoroughly
anti-English; very ‘Papistical’ in the odour of its heavily-charged
atmosphere, but betraying the combined silliness and ferocity which
distinguished the Stuarts themselves, in a hero-worship for the most
cruel enemies of England. For instance, in the poem called ‘Blot of
Chivalry,’ Charles Edward Stuart, the author, deifies Napoleon, and,
if there be any meaning at all to be attached to the words, execrates
England. In the ‘Appeal of the Faithful,’ there is a mysterious
declaration that the writer, or the faithful few, will not bow the head
to Somebody, and there are as mysterious references to things which
might have been, only that they happened to be otherwise.
[Sidenote: _THE BLACK COCKADE._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account