London in the Jacobite times, Volume IIDoran, Dr. (John)
History
London in the Jacobite times, Volume II
Doran, Dr. (John)
London (England) -- History -- 18th century
he knocked down Donald Alison for violently assaulting the Comte’s
landlady in a Pimlico lodging house!
[Sidenote: _STUART ALLIANCES._]
A year previously, the Lady Alice Mary Emily Hay, daughter of the 17th
Earl of Errol, and therefore of the blood of Kilmarnock, did Colonel
the Count Edward Stuart d’Albanie the honour to become his wife. The
Colonel is the son of ‘The Count d’Albanie.’
This marriage is thus chronicled in Lodge’s Peerage (1877, p. 238),
‘Lady Alice Mary Emily (Hay) _b._ 6th July, 1835, _m._ 1st May, 1874,
Colonel the Count Charles Edward d’Albanie, only son of Charles Edward
Stuart, Count d’Albanie, and Anne Beresford, daughter of the Hon. John
de la Poer Beresford, brother of the 1st Marquis of Waterford.’ Anne
Beresford――widow Gardiner,――is variously described as marrying, in
1822, ‘C. E. Stuart, Esq.,’ and ‘Charles Stuart Allen, younger son of
Thomas Hay Allen.’
The Colonel Count d’Albanie who married Lady Alice Hay is said to have
been in the service of Don Carlos, than which nothing could so little
recommend him to a humane, right-thinking, liberal, peace-loving,
blood-odour-hating world. There is, however, manifestly, some
difficulty in identifying the descendants of Lieutenant Thomas Allen,
or Red Eagle, who mistook himself for a never-existing son of the once
‘young Chevalier.’ Perhaps the countship of Albany is not the exclusive
possession of Lieutenant Allen’s descendants. It is at least certain
that, a couple of years ago, there was some talk in London of a Count
and Countess ‘d’Albanie,’ in Hungary, but what their pretensions were
has gone out of memory; but they must, rightly or wrongly, have had
_some_, if the tale be true that they quitted a small estate there,
somewhat offended, because the bishop of the diocese had refused to
allow them to sit in the sanctuary of some church, on purple velvet
chairs!
[Sidenote: _FULLER PARTICULARS._]
In all this affair Lieutenant Thomas Allen may deserve rather to be
pitied than blamed. That he was under a delusion seems undeniable. The
immediate victims of it, his sons, do not forfeit respect for crediting
a father’s assertions. They or their descendants must not expect the
world to have the same confidence in them.
A clear and comprehensive view of this family matter may be acquired
by perusing the following statement, which appeared in ‘Notes and
Queries,’ July 28th, 1877, and which is from one who speaks with
knowledge and authority.
‘When James Stuart, Count d’Albanie, died, he left two sons and one
daughter.’
To understand this starting point aright, the reader should remember
that the above-named James Stuart was originally known as Lieutenant
Thomas Allen, second son of Admiral Allen. The two sons and one
daughter are thus enumerated:――
‘1st. John Sobieski Stuart, Count d’Albanie,
2nd. Count Charles Edward d’Albanie.
3rd. Countess Catherine Matilda d’Albanie.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account