London (England) -- History -- 17th century; London (England) -- Social life and customs -- 17th century
Another company was also struggling with difficulties, as the following
extract from the same Report shows:—
“10th March, 1675. The petition of the Master, Warden, Assistants
and Commonaltie of the Corporation of Pin-makers, London, to the
King; with paper of proposals attached thereto Reminding his
Majesty of a contract made between Him and their Company, for
the benefit alike of His Majesty and the London Pin-makers, that
came to nought in consequence of the Great Plague and the Dutch,
the Pin-makers beg for an aid of £20,000—£10,000 thereof to be
laid out in wire, to be bought of His Majesty at 30d. per hundred
weight about the current rate of such wire; and the other £10,000
thereof to be used as a fund by Commissioners, and the pins being
distributed to buyers at a cost sufficient only to cover the charge
of production. By operation of the scheme, embodied in these
proposals, it is urged the trade of the pin-making will revive, the
pin-makers will have full and lucrative employment, and his Majesty
will by his profit on the wire receive a revenue of at least £4000
per annum.”
The most important civic event in the reign of William was the
foundation of the Bank of England. The bankers of the City had been,
as we have seen, the goldsmiths, who not only received and kept money
for their customers, but lent it out, for them and for themselves, on
interest. Thus, when Charles the Second, on January 2, 1672, closed the
Exchequer, his creditors could obtain neither principal nor interest.
He then owed the goldsmiths of London the sum of £1,328,526. Some
of the older banks of London trace a descent to the goldsmiths of the
seventeenth century—Child’s, for instance, Hoare’s, and others.
[Illustration: A PERSPECTIVE VIEW OF THE BANK OF ENGLAND, 1743
From Maitland’s _History and Survey of London_.]
The idea of a National Bank seems to have been considered and discussed
for some years before it was carried into effect. The principal
advocate of the scheme was a Scotchman named William Anderson. The
advantages which he put forward in defence of the Bank were the support
of public credit and the relief of the Government from the ruinous
terms upon which supplies were then raised. There was great difficulty
in getting the scheme considered, but it was at last passed by an Act
of Parliament in 1693. By the terms of this Act it was provided that
the Government should take a loan of £1,200,000 from the Bank, this
amount to be subscribed; additional taxes were imposed which would
produce about £140,000 a year, out of which the Bank was to receive
£100,000 a year, including interest at 8 per cent, and £4000 a year for
management. The Company was empowered to purchase lands, and to deal in
bills of exchange and gold and silver bullion, but not to buy or sell
merchandise, though they might sell unredeemed goods on which they had
made advances.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account