London (England) -- History -- 17th century; London (England) -- Social life and customs -- 17th century
The foundation of the Bank of England brought about a complete
revolution in the relations of Crown and City. We have seen that
hitherto the City was called the King’s Chamber; when the King wanted
money he sent to the City for a loan; sometimes he asked more than the
City could lend; generally the City readily conceded the loan.
In a note, Sharpe calls attention to the absurdity of representing the
Chancellor of the Exchequer going about, hat in hand, borrowing £100 of
this hosier and £100 from that ironmonger:—
“The mode of procedure was nearly always the same. The lords of
the treasury would appear some morning before the Common Council,
and after a few words of explanation as to the necessities of the
time, would ask for a loan, offering in most cases undeniable
security. Supposing that the Council agreed to raise the required
loan, which it nearly always did, the mayor for the time being was
usually instructed to issue his precept to the aldermen to collect
subscriptions within their several wards, whilst other precepts
were (in later times at least) sent to the master of wardens of
the livery companies to do the same among the members of their
companies. There were times, also, when the companies were called
upon to subscribe in proportion to their assessment for supplying
the City with corn in times of distress” (_London and the Kingdom_,
vol. ii. pp. 586, 587).
The last loan ever asked by the King of the City was that asked by
William the Third in 1697 to pay off his navy after the Peace of
Utrecht. Instead of going to the City the King went to the Bank, but
not then without the authority of Parliament. The City was no longer
to be the Treasurer—or the Pawnbroker—of the King and the nation. This
event, though the citizens did not apprehend its full meaning for
many years, deprived London of that special power which had made her
from the Norman Conquest alternately the object of the Sovereign’s
affections or of his hatred. Henceforth it mattered nothing to London
whether the King loved or hated her. The power of the City was now
exercised legitimately by her representatives in the House of Commons.
CHAPTER VII
THE IRISH ESTATES
The following history of the Irish estates is taken from _London and
Londonderry_, published in Belfast (1890) by Messrs. Marcus Ward and Co.
In the year 1608 the first steps were taken towards the settlement
of Ulster by English and Scotch emigrants—a measure whose wisdom was
shown eighty years later, when the grandson of James the First owed his
expulsion largely to the descendants of the original settlers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account