London (England) -- History -- 17th century; London (England) -- Social life and customs -- 17th century
“If multitudes of men were employed proportionally to these
commodities which might be there by industry attained, many
thousands would be set on work to the great service of the King,
strength of his realm, advancement of several trades, and benefit
of particular persons, whom the infinite increasing greatness
(that often doth minister occasion of ruin to itself) of this
city might not only conveniently spare, but also reap a singular
commodity by easing themselves of an insupportable burthen which so
surcharged all the parts of the city that one tradesman can scarce
live by another, which in all probability would be a means also
and preserve the city from infection; and by consequence the whole
kingdom, of necessity, must have recourse thither, which persons
pestered or closed up together can neither otherwise or very hardly
avoid” (_London and Londonderry_, p. 7).
On July 1, 1609, the Court of Aldermen sent a precept to each of the
City Companies asking them to appoint representatives to consider the
propositions. The Companies refused to undertake this work. Thereupon
the Mayor appointed a Committee, ignoring the refusal of the Companies,
to carry out the undertaking. This Committee sent an order to the
Companies to ascertain what each member would willingly undertake.
On August 1, 1609, the City sent out four “viewers” to survey the
place intended for the new Plantation and “to make report to this
City.” The viewers returned in December, when it was resolved that
£15,000 should be raised to meet preliminary expenses. The money was
to be raised _in_ the Companies, not by the Companies. Meantime the
City asked for certain additional advantages, including forces for
defence to be maintained at the King’s charges. It was agreed that 200
houses should be built at Derry, leaving room for 300 more, and that
100 houses should be built at Coleraine, leaving room for 200 more,
and that fortifications should be constructed. Another sum of £5000
was then ordered to be raised. In January 1610 the demands of the City
were granted by the Privy Council. It is important to observe that the
“undertaking” by the City was not a purchase by the Companies, but
taxation of the members of the Companies by order of the City, just as
any other tax was imposed and collected. Some of the poorer Companies
were exempted, but not the “abler” men among them.
In July 1611 another contribution of £20,000 was raised by tax. In
this case those Companies which might choose to lose the benefits
resulting from their previous contributions were exempt—a privilege
accepted by two of the Companies.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account